Teams

Triple The Fun

2022 Tri-One Doubles League · 4.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-04vs Serve 'em Up!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMineko Szkotak / Akiko Oshiro vs Junko Kadomatsu / Marci Amii0-6, 0-6
2022-08-28vs Ruru Tri 4.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAkiko Oshiro / Mineko Szkotak vs Caasi Nakasone / Nicole Imanaka5-7, 3-6
2022-08-13vs Serve 'em Up!Won 10
W#1 DoublesShannon Rogers / Akiko Oshiro vs Marci Amii / Alisha Wallace6-3, 6-0
2022-08-06vs Ruru Tri 4.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesNikki Morimoto / Akiko Oshiro vs Nicole Imanaka / Erin Mitsuyoshi6-1, 6-2
2022-07-23vs Serve 'em Up!Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAshley Cabral / Nikki Morimoto vs Marci Amii / Colleen Oshiro1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-07-16vs Ruru Tri 4.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAshley Cabral / Shannon Rogers vs Ean Smith / Irene Ma6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-07-02vs Serve 'em Up!Won 10
W#1 DoublesShannon Rogers / Nikki Morimoto vs Marci Amii / Junko Kadomatsu3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-25vs Ruru Tri 4.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAshley Cabral / Shannon Rogers vs Caasi Nakasone / Nicole Imanaka1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ruru Tri 4.55353870
2Serve 'em Up!44441066
3Triple The Fun35351176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ashley Cabral
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Nikki Morimoto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Akiko Oshiro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Mineko Szkotak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Shannon Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mineko Szkotak + Akiko Oshiro23957% games+4.2% vs expected
Akiko Oshiro + Shannon Rogers3351% games+1.8% vs expected
Nikki Morimoto + Shannon Rogers6065% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Cabral + Shannon Rogers2352% gamesnot enough data
Nikki Morimoto + Akiko Oshiro314 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Cabral + Nikki Morimoto213 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Cabral + Akiko Oshiro303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ashley Cabral
26W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Nikki Morimoto
90W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Akiko Oshiro
104W–82L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
Mineko Szkotak
44W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Shannon Rogers
85W–42L career · 4 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.