Teams

SE 7.5W 18&Over Williams

2025 Selma Southern Combo Doubles 18's · Women's 7.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-28vs SE 7.5W 18&Over ToddWon 21
W#1 DoublesRebecca Youngblood / Katie Barrette vs Keisha Wilson / Landon Posey7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAshley Williams / Sid Utsey vs Amanda Henry / Jessica Spivey6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLilly Youngblood / Callen Free vs Bradford Brackin / Kim Simpkins6-3, 6-4
2025-09-14vs SE 7.5W 18&Over ToddWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Pearce / Callen Free vs Bradford Brackin / Keisha Wilson6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMary Ashlyn Pearce / Katie Barrette vs Amanda Henry / Jessica Spivey4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDANITA ALLEN / Leigh Chappelle vs Kim Simpkins / Landon Posey6-3, 6-3
2025-08-26vs SE 7.5W 18&Over ToddWon 30
W#1 DoublesDANITA ALLEN / Katie Barrette vs Amanda Henry / Bradford Brackin6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLilly Youngblood / Leigh Chappelle vs Jessica Spivey / Keisha Wilson7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAshley Williams / Sid Utsey vs Rachel Todd / Kim Simpkins6-2, 6-4
2025-08-17vs SE 7.5W 18&Over ToddWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Pearce / Callen Free vs Keisha Wilson / Kim Simpkins6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRebecca Youngblood / Sid Utsey vs Bradford Brackin / Amanda Henry6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMary Ashlyn Pearce / Leigh Chappelle vs Jessica Spivey / Rachel Todd6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
DANITA ALLEN
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.64
Mary Ashlyn Pearce
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Sid Utsey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Leigh Chappelle
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.30
Callen Free
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Katie Barrette
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lilly Youngblood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michelle Pearce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Pearce + Callen Free404 matchesnot enough data
Katie Barrette + Sid Utsey044 matchesnot enough data
Sid Utsey + Leigh Chappelle224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
DANITA ALLEN
24W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Mary Ashlyn Pearce
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Sid Utsey
27W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Leigh Chappelle
28W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Callen Free
8W–1L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Katie Barrette
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Lilly Youngblood
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Pearce
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.