Teams

Jetc/Peters

2026 Broward Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-28vs Midtown/CraigLost 12
W#1 DoublesEmily Riesenberg / Katherine Cashman vs Heloisa Faria / Maritza Craig6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPatty Echarte / Leah Parodi vs Maria Valeria Yandet / Lidamari Lopez2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKiki Frazier / Cynthia Chruszczyk vs Francisca Ojeda / Adriana Gonzalez2-6, 1-6
2026-08-21vs Veltri/SaraWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Riesenberg / Katherine Cashman vs Maria Monserratte / Georgina Friend4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Katz / Randi Greenfield vs Mariana Rodriguez / Christine Picanza6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatty Echarte / Irina Rich vs Raeven Yester / Sara Contreras6-4, 6-1
2026-08-14vs Midtown/TorresLost 12
L#1 DoublesCynthia Chruszczyk / Heather Hosseini vs Maria Alejandra Sempe / Marycelys Delgado6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTina Alderman / Eva Roshberg vs Delia Bolanos / Deborah Marshall4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPatty Echarte / Irina Rich vs Andrea Vianna / ROMINA CARENA4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-07vs Midtown/CraigLost 12
L#1 DoublesGina Powers / Irina Rich vs Adriana Gonzalez / Jeehye Park0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKatherine Cashman / Heather Hosseini vs Rosmary Bohorquez / Maritza Craig6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanet Moreira / Kiki Frazier vs Lidamari Lopez / Maria Valeria Yandet1-6, 0-6
2026-07-31vs Veltri/SaraLost 12
L#1 DoublesTina Alderman / Eva Roshberg vs Mariana Rodriguez / Christine Picanza2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAndrea Katz / Katherine Cashman vs Maria Monserratte / Yrma Petersen4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Riesenberg / Leah Parodi vs Sally Hernadez / Sara Contreras4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-07-24vs Midtown/TorresWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarcy Peters / Eva Roshberg vs Carol Kelly / Marycelys Delgado6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHeather Hosseini / Cynthia Chruszczyk vs Claudia Torres / Carla Garces6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEmily Riesenberg / Leah Parodi vs Raquel de Jesus / Tania Kiger6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Tina Alderman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Marcy Peters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Patty Echarte
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Gina Powers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Heather Hosseini
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Andrea Katz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Katherine Cashman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Kiki Frazier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Leah Parodi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.67
Cynthia Chruszczyk
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Irina Rich
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Tracey T Williford
published
2.63
Janet Moreira
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Eva Roshberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Emily Riesenberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Randi Greenfield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leah Parodi + Cynthia Chruszczyk5549% gamesnot enough data
Tina Alderman + Gina Powers224 matchesnot enough data
Heather Hosseini + Katherine Cashman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tina Alderman
30W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
Marcy Peters
18W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Patty Echarte
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Gina Powers
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Heather Hosseini
85W–80L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Andrea Katz
2W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Katherine Cashman
11W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Kiki Frazier
13W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Leah Parodi
76W–126L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Cynthia Chruszczyk
18W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Irina Rich
18W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
Tracey T Williford
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Janet Moreira
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Eva Roshberg
8W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
2.62
Emily Riesenberg
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Randi Greenfield
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.