Teams

USTA Atlanta/Carolyn Watkins

USTA Atlanta Summer - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 4.0 Women (Arrie Lugar)

20 players · average NTRP 3.67 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Arrie Lugar) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Tangela Sanders
published
3.95
Lucille Watkins
published
3.89
Akisha Paige-Bey
published 4
3.87
Diane Hamilton
published 4
3.80
Trinidad Osselyn
published
3.69
Monica Cooley
published
3.48
Rayna Nash
published
3.43
Vanessa Jackson
published
3.38
Audrey Howlette
published 3.5
3.37
Lagaylia Appleby
published
3.37
Joyce Frederick
published
3.37
Carolyn Watkins
published 3.5
3.34
Audrey Sherrod
published 3.5
3.33
Tonya Blanks
published
3.33
Sylvia Ware
published
3.27
Kristin Voghell
published
Denise Lumpkin
published 3.5
3.23
Lydia Flowers
published
2.98
Melissa Young
published
Kathy Ware
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Cooley + Carolyn Watkins51545% games−2.9% vs expected
Audrey Howlette + Vanessa Jackson1937% games−4.4% vs expected
Lucille Watkins + Diane Hamilton303 matchesnot enough data
Lagaylia Appleby + Kristin Voghell123 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Watkins + Akisha Paige-Bey303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tangela Sanders
20W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
4.15
Lucille Watkins
24W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Akisha Paige-Bey
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
Diane Hamilton
52W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
Trinidad Osselyn
17W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Monica Cooley
20W–23L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Rayna Nash
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
Vanessa Jackson
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Audrey Howlette
2W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Lagaylia Appleby
42W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Joyce Frederick
18W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Carolyn Watkins
14W–40L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Audrey Sherrod
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Tonya Blanks
18W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
Sylvia Ware
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Kristin Voghell
21W–32L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Denise Lumpkin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lydia Flowers
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Melissa Young
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.98
Kathy Ware
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.