Teams

El.Nixon40S

2026 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-01vs An.Garey40SLost 12
L#1 SinglesCasey Novak vs Meghan Richardson2-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJosette Huntress vs Julie Bullock6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesMichele Lagerstedt vs Rebecca Harris3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-07-31vs He.McCann40SWon 21
L#1 SinglesBrianna Shait vs June Sila6-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAmanda Shelton vs Heidi McCann7-5, 6-1
W#3 SinglesCatherine Wilborne vs Lisa Merritt6-0, 6-0
2026-07-18vs Je.Wolborsky40SWon 21
L#1 SinglesBrianna Shait vs Lora Barnett5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMichele Lagerstedt vs Michelle Eisenberg6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAmanda Shelton vs Ange Urlaub6-4, 6-3
2026-07-04vs La.McRee40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesCasey Novak vs Miriam Waters6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMichele Lagerstedt vs Lanier McRee4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesVina Jordano vs Amanda Brandon7-5, 6-1
2026-06-27vs An.Garey40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesCasey Novak vs Allison Bubar6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesElisabeth Nixon vs Ann Garey0-6, 1-4
W#3 SinglesCatherine Wilborne vs Rebecca Harris3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-20vs He.McCann40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesCasey Novak vs Alise Fredrickson7-5, 7-5
L#2 SinglesAmanda Shelton vs Jeannette Walker6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesBrianna Shait vs Robin Wascher6-0, 6-4
2026-06-13vs Je.Wolborsky40SLost 12
W#1 SinglesBrianna Shait vs Julie Newson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAmanda Shelton vs Ange Urlaub6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMelissa Rini vs Jeanne Russell6-7, 2-6
2026-05-30vs La.McRee40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesCasey Novak vs Lanier McRee7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesElisabeth Nixon vs Stephanie Fogarty2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesVina Jordano vs Kristen Duke2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Josette Huntress
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.95
Melissa Rini
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.85
Catherine Wilborne
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.84
Brianna Shait
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.82
Michele Lagerstedt
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.74
Amanda Shelton
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.68
Casey Novak
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.46
Elisabeth Nixon
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.40
Vina Jordano
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casey Novak + Melissa Rini5160% games+7.3% vs expected
Josette Huntress + Brianna Shait7167% gamesnot enough data
Josette Huntress + Michele Lagerstedt4165% gamesnot enough data
Brianna Shait + Melissa Rini5061% gamesnot enough data
Michele Lagerstedt + Brianna Shait033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Josette Huntress
38W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Melissa Rini
65W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Catherine Wilborne
57W–46L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Brianna Shait
86W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Michele Lagerstedt
58W–62L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Amanda Shelton
9W–12L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Casey Novak
114W–83L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Elisabeth Nixon
2W–9L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.46
Vina Jordano
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.