Teams

Leventhal/Potash (Royal Palm)

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 4.0 Adult Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Andrea Potash
published 4
3.81
Heather Hewitson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.77
Leslee Gross
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #4 Doubles 13% · published
3.76
Monica Morin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
3.73
Barbara Cabassa
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.73
Lisa Leventhal
published
3.71
Marianne Pantin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Michelle Pasko
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.62
Maria de Las Casas
published
3.57
Viola Lake
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.55
Doris Sullivan
published
3.53
Kelly Foreman
published
3.48
Ana Thompson
published 3.5
3.30
Brenda Salgado
published 3.5
3.24
Monika Martins
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.18
Diana Eldridge
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Rosy Bild
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Monica Warman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Morin + Andrea Potash9162% games+8.6% vs expected
Marianne Pantin + Viola Lake4553% games+2.3% vs expected
Marianne Pantin + Kelly Foreman4646% games−10.0% vs expected
Barbara Cabassa + Viola Lake3644% games−14.5% vs expected
Monica Morin + Kelly Foreman7556% gamesnot enough data
Monika Martins + Rosy Bild4748% gamesnot enough data
Diana Eldridge + Michelle Pasko3543% gamesnot enough data
Rosy Bild + Kelly Foreman2645% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Potash
12W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.93
4
Heather Hewitson
63W–36L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Leslee Gross
38W–37L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Monica Morin
110W–94L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
Julie Gutierrez-Fletcher
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Barbara Cabassa
70W–66L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Lisa Leventhal
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Marianne Pantin
45W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Michelle Pasko
43W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
Maria de Las Casas
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Viola Lake
52W–68L career · 6 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.57
Doris Sullivan
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
Kelly Foreman
63W–57L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Ana Thompson
18W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Brenda Salgado
25W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Monika Martins
54W–67L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Diana Eldridge
38W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Rosy Bild
90W–91L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Monica Warman
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.