Teams

Brown - PCC

2024 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.12 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-19vs Escambia/McCall/18&Over8.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlycia Esmonde / Alexia Rycroft vs Melanie Hoad / Tricia Hafdahl4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesIve Marsach / Trisha Lea vs Mikaela McManus / Rachel Trahan7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2024-12-19vs Escambia/McCall/18&Over8.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmanda Brown / Alexia Rycroft vs Whitney Calametti / Susan Nitterauer6-2, 6-4
2024-11-21vs Escambia/McCall/18&Over8.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesKIMBERLY ANDREWS / Trisha Lea vs Whitney Calametti / Debbie Wroten7-5, 6-1
2024-11-14vs Escambia/McCall/18&Over8.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmanda Brown / Alexia Rycroft vs Whitney Calametti / Debbie Wroten6-4, 6-4
2024-11-07vs Escambia/McCall/18&Over8.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlexia Rycroft / Shannon Schluter vs Rachel Trahan / Tricia Hafdahl1-6, 5-7
2024-10-24vs Escambia/McCall/18&Over8.5WWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlexia Rycroft / Amanda Brown vs Shellie McCall / Tami McGhee6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Alexia Rycroft
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.02
Jami Steinmetz
published
3.99
Jennifer Passeretti
published
3.90
Shannon Schluter
published
3.86
Ive Marsach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Alycia Esmonde
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Cherie Krohn
published 4
3.63
KIMBERLY ANDREWS
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Amanda Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Trisha Lea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

KIMBERLY ANDREWS + Ive Marsach123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexia Rycroft
28W–18L career · 5 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
4.17
Jami Steinmetz
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
Jennifer Passeretti
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
53%47%<1%
3.99
Shannon Schluter
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
Ive Marsach
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Alycia Esmonde
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
Cherie Krohn
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
KIMBERLY ANDREWS
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Amanda Brown
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
Trisha Lea
17W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.