Teams

Lane - Mixed 55s 8.0

2022 Piedmont Mixed Doubles 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 55 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-26vs Majestic - Mixed 55s 8.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSteve Webster / Libby Strickland vs Tapio Martti / Diane Majestic5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-07-12vs Brown K. - Mixed 55s 8.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesBill King / Libby Strickland vs Peter Novosad / Kathy Pace6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-28vs Smith - Mixed 55's 8.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSteve Webster / Libby Strickland vs Suzanne Rudy / Jim Cantrell6-7, 4-6
2022-06-21vs Majestic - Mixed 55s 8.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesBill King / Libby Strickland vs Lynne Murray / John Rodenbough7-5, 6-2
2022-06-07vs Brown K. - Mixed 55s 8.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesBill King / Libby Strickland vs Peter Novosad / Kathy Pace7-5, 6-3
2022-05-31vs Haggard - Mixed 55s 8.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEvelyn Strader / Robert Hager vs John W Quick / Joy Martin3-6, 4-5
2022-05-24vs Smith - Mixed 55's 8.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesTony Smith / Libby Strickland vs Charles Dawson / Caroline McAlister4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPeter Glud / Evelyn Strader vs Keith Black / Aprille Black2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bill King
published 4
Frank Kincaid
published 4
3.69
Libby Strickland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Yvonne Singh
published
3.56
Lynn Chafin
published
3.54
Lisa Andree
published
3.51
Peter Glud
published
3.45
Evelyn Strader
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Debbie Lane
published 3.5
Robert Hager
published
Robin Andree
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Evelyn Strader + Peter Glud3448% gamesnot enough data
Robin Andree + Lisa Andree123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bill King
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Frank Kincaid
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Libby Strickland
128W–110L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Yvonne Singh
13W–2L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
Lynn Chafin
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.56
Lisa Andree
24W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.54
Peter Glud
16W–18L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
4
Evelyn Strader
66W–110L career · 2 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Debbie Lane
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Hager
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robin Andree
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.