Teams

Langley/Memphis

2024 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 2.5 Women 18 & over

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-24vs Heist/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesElza McKenna / Melody Greene vs Kim Badger / Shaila Anderson6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMary Raine Ivy vs Sandy Simcoe6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesNicole Albert / Lauren Fontenot vs Kathy Ferrara / Jennifer Dye6-2, 6-0
2024-04-17vs Moore/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesElza McKenna / Melody Greene vs Krista York / Anna Smith6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMelanie Schrank vs Diana Phillips3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Raine Ivy / Lauren Fontenot vs Jenny Harmeier / Lisa Warren6-1, 6-4
2024-04-09vs Sudduth/ MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesSophie Edwards / Elza McKenna vs Alison Elkington / Rebekah Sudduth6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelanie Schrank / Nicole Albert vs Morgan Ray / Mary Marshall Fenton7-5, 7-5
2024-04-05vs Greer/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesElza McKenna / Sophie Edwards vs Whitney Greer / Leigh Lamb6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNicole Albert vs Caitlyn Arkwright6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelanie Schrank / Lauren Fontenot vs Rebekah Molnar / Leigh Ann Carkeet6-2, 6-0
2024-03-27vs George/MemphisWon 10
W#1 DoublesElza McKenna / Melanie Schrank vs Caroline Palmer / Lee Yates6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Sophie Edwards
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.84
Melanie Schrank
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.58
Elza McKenna
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.56
Melody Greene
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Fontenot
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Raine Ivy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Nicole Albert
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Schrank + Elza McKenna3348% games+12.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sophie Edwards
45W–13L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Melanie Schrank
32W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Elza McKenna
24W–32L career · 10 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.58
Melody Greene
21W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
Lauren Fontenot
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Raine Ivy
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicole Albert
7W–4L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.