Teams

WTC Andrews Tri-Level 40over

2025 Dothan USTA Tri-Level 40 & Over · Women 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-01vs DO-4.0-3.0W 40 & Over (Collins)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMichele Andrews / Karmen Dorsey vs Melissa Byrd / Martha Collins1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVicki Bitney / Billie Gore vs Kimberly Griger / Jessica Kelley1-6, 2-6
2025-08-01vs DO-4.0-3.0W 40 & Over (Collins)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKarmen Dorsey / Michele Andrews vs Melissa Byrd / Beverly Shields2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesVicki Bitney / Cathy Ogilvie vs Kimberly Griger / Jessica Kelley2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBernadette Haskins / Carol Hundley vs Mandy Pesamoska / Allison Edwards6-1, 0-6, 1-0
2025-07-17vs DO-4.0-3.0W 40 & Over (Collins)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMichele Andrews / Billie Gore vs Darla Grubb / Beverly Shields1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesVicki Bitney / Cathy Ogilvie vs Jessica Kelley / Jessica Deck2-6, 0-6
2025-07-16vs DO-4.0-3.0W 40 & Over (Collins)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKarmen Dorsey / Michele Andrews vs Martha Collins / Ijen Liu3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBillie Gore / Cathy Ogilvie vs Jessica Kelley / Jessica Deck2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCarol Hundley / Jenny Nelson vs Karelia Castillo / Katrina Leadbetter3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Karmen Dorsey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Billie Gore
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Carol Hundley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Vicki Bitney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Cathy Ogilvie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Jenny Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Bernadette Haskins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lydia Camacho
published
Michele Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Ogilvie + Vicki Bitney0720% games−15.1% vs expected
Jenny Nelson + Carol Hundley3254% gamesnot enough data
Michele Andrews + Karmen Dorsey033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karmen Dorsey
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Billie Gore
0W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carol Hundley
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Vicki Bitney
4W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Cathy Ogilvie
1W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.92
Jenny Nelson
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
2.5
Bernadette Haskins
3W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
Lydia Camacho
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Andrews
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.