Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC CW9.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 9.5

18 players · average NTRP 4.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 9.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.28 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
Chiara Schwab
published 5
4.79
Bryce Kristal
published 5
4.55
Stephanie Areen
published
4.48
Cristina Tudor
published 5
4.39
Sara Schipani
published
4.35
Stephanie Alexander
published
4.33
Signy Judd
published
4.32
Mariia Gryukova
published
4.26
Marianne Dundon
published
4.24
Nicole Goridkov
published
4.23
Seena Shanker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Julia Overs Bates
published
4.14
Lena Larionova
published
4.12
Alexandra Gunnell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.07
Julia Porter
published
3.79
Jill Van Slyke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Marilyn Morrell-Kristal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kimiko Kearney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Alexander + Stephanie Areen4257% games+1.9% vs expected
Marianne Dundon + Signy Judd0535% games−15.7% vs expected
Stephanie Alexander + Cristina Tudor404 matchesnot enough data
Alexandra Gunnell + Seena Shanker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Chiara Schwab
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.83
5
Bryce Kristal
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.79
Stephanie Areen
11W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.55
5
Cristina Tudor
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.48
Sara Schipani
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
4.39
Stephanie Alexander
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
4.35
Signy Judd
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.33
Mariia Gryukova
25W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
Marianne Dundon
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
Nicole Goridkov
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.24
Seena Shanker
18W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Julia Overs Bates
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
4.15
Lena Larionova
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.14
4.5
Alexandra Gunnell
29W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
Julia Porter
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.07
Jill Van Slyke
7W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.79
Marilyn Morrell-Kristal
1W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.70
Kimiko Kearney
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.