Teams

Kim/RB/Foothills

2026 Foothills Singles 18 & over · 3.5 Singles Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 7 6:30 PM
at Geyer/LHCC/Foothils
Lake Hickory Country Club
2026-08-13vs Reese/DV/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 SinglesAndrea Sain vs Jill Reese4-6, 4-6
2026-08-06vs Shokes/CCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 SinglesMarsha Phillips vs Carissa Williams6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-30vs Bolick/LHCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#3 SinglesMarsha Phillips vs Meghan Young3-6, 3-6
2026-07-23Won 10
W#2 SinglesJennifer Blaz vs Emily Moore7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Singles Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Andrea Sain
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Maile Kim
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.13
Becky Brittain
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
3.07
Emily Spillman
published
3.06
Marsha Phillips
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.93
Jennifer Blaz
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.91
Staci Shafer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky Brittain + Emily Spillman5262% games+5.5% vs expected
Maile Kim + Andrea Sain4249% games−0.3% vs expected
Maile Kim + Becky Brittain6254% games−0.8% vs expected
Becky Brittain + Marsha Phillips3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Sain
20W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
Maile Kim
24W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Becky Brittain
137W–96L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
Emily Spillman
25W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
3
Marsha Phillips
107W–74L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
Jennifer Blaz
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Staci Shafer
196W–223L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.