Teams

HHTL/Tolley/Spring Lake

Combo 55 & Over · Men's 7.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-02vs HHTL55/Harkins/Moss CreekWon 21
L#1 DoublesAlbert Day / Brian Tolley vs Chris Keenan / Christian Cole2-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesWilliam Gardner / Alan Mock vs Pete Carson / James Malkin6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMike McVey / Jeffrey Weldon vs Bradley Nicklin / Sam Carucci6-3, 6-4
2026-09-01vs HHTL55/Harkins/Moss CreekWon 21
L#1 DoublesWilliam Gardner / Brian Thomas vs Chris Keenan / Sam Carucci4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAlbert Day / Jim Zack vs Bradley Nicklin / Christian Cole7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAndrew Rogers / David Kehres vs Pete Carson / Michael Geiger6-2, 6-1
2026-08-31vs HHTL55/Harkins/Moss CreekLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlbert Day / Alan Mock vs Chris Keenan / Sam Carucci5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMike McVey / Jeffrey Weldon vs James Malkin / Tom Harkins6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJim Zack / David Kehres vs Bradley Nicklin / Evan Welsh3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-08-04vs HHTL55/Harkins/Moss CreekWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlbert Day / Alan Mock vs David Myers / Evan Welsh6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrian Tolley / Mike McVey vs Sam Carucci / Jeff Churchich6-3, 6-1
2026-07-28vs HHTL55/Harkins/Moss CreekWon 20
W#2 DoublesWilliam Gardner / Brian Tolley vs Tom Harkins / James Diaz6-3, 5-0
W#3 DoublesAlbert Day / Jeffrey Weldon vs Sam Carucci / Jeff Churchich6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men's 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HHTL/Tolley/Spring Lake2060025
2HHTL55/Harkins/Moss Creek02061272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Albert Day
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.94
Mike McVey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.88
Andrew Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Chris Hall
published 4
3.70
William Gardner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
David Kehres
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.52
Jeffrey Weldon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.44
Jim Zack
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Alan Mock
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Brian Tolley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alan Mock + Albert Day224 matchesnot enough data
Jim Zack + David Kehres314 matchesnot enough data
Mike McVey + Jeffrey Weldon224 matchesnot enough data
Brian Tolley + Albert Day213 matchesnot enough data
Mike McVey + Albert Day213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Albert Day
91W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
Mike McVey
19W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Andrew Rogers
14W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.88
4
Chris Hall
14W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
William Gardner
36W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
3.5
David Kehres
29W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.62
Jeffrey Weldon
48W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
Jim Zack
31W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Alan Mock
34W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Brian Tolley
57W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.