Teams

Erickson/Springdale/IND

2024 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-02-01vs McLaughlin-Chrenka/Rogers/SVCCLost 02
L#1 SinglesKristen Doll vs Shangwen Huang3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 SinglesLacey Baker vs Tiffany Harris4-6, 3-6
2024-11-20vs McLaughlin-Chrenka/Rogers/SVCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesGrace McCasland vs Laurel Schley0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMadison Kendall vs Deanna Cicatiello1-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMonte Broussard vs Kayla McLaughlin6-4, 6-2
2024-11-05vs Snell/Rogers/MRCLost 12
L#1 SinglesKristen Doll vs Brittani Hradsky7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAlison Creasey vs Samantha Neel3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 SinglesGrace McCasland vs Emma Slone6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Monte Broussard
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.85
Alison Creasey
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.76
Madison Kendall
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.73
Samantha Thiede Erickson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.47
Grace McCasland
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Kristen Doll
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Lacey Baker
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monte Broussard + Samantha Thiede Erickson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Monte Broussard
9W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Alison Creasey
20W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%87%12%
2.85
Madison Kendall
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.76
Samantha Thiede Erickson
32W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Grace McCasland
6W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.47
Kristen Doll
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lacey Baker
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.