Teams

KKnoblauch

2022 Capital Summer 18 & Over Singles League · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-01vs EMaxSARCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKari Knoblauch vs Elizabeth Carroll7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs Jessica Williams6-1, 6-1
2022-07-30Won 10
W#1 SinglesKari Knoblauch vs Teri Jimenez6-1, 6-2
2022-07-25vs JKomesWon 10
W#2 SinglesKathryn Shields vs Kathan Griscik6-1, 6-0
2022-07-11vs AFalsone/RiddickLost 12
W#1 SinglesKari Knoblauch vs Paige Coltrera6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesKathryn Shields vs Lindsey Howard5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesNicole Masters vs Leah Brinkley2-6, 1-6
2022-07-05Won 10
W#3 SinglesKathryn Shields vs Jessica Williams6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-20vs JKomesWon 20
W#2 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs Hazel Holland6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesNicole Masters vs Zsuzsa Wahlen6-2, 6-4
2022-06-13vs SparsonsLost 01
L#3 SinglesNicole Masters vs Kristine Potter3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-06-06vs AFalsone/RiddickWon 20
W#1 SinglesKari Knoblauch vs Leah Brinkley6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs Amanda Falsone6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Kari Knoblauch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.03
Catie Cunningham
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Lindsay Strickland
published
2.84
2.77
Kathryn Shields
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.65
Emily Boyer
published 3
2.57
Nicole Masters
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Masters + Kathryn Shields123 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Masters + Kari Knoblauch213 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Shields + Kari Knoblauch213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kari Knoblauch
114W–69L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%24%76%
3.09
3.5
Catie Cunningham
98W–63L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
Lindsay Strickland
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Courtney Grinnell
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Kathryn Shields
88W–91L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Emily Boyer
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Nicole Masters
45W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.