Teams

BIR FERRELL

2026 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-17vs ALL BENNETT/GUIROLALost 02
L#2 DoublesHeidi Ferrell / Elizabeth Tuazon Perez vs Shannon Mulroy / Maria Isabel Pena-Keller2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLaura Church / Kelley Gilpin vs Lauren Selking / Lindsey Edwards2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-16vs STC ALLENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBrandy Oetman / Elena Batsalkin vs Alison Allen / Mandy Curtis4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesKelley Gilpin vs Christina Hill2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCourtney Hesse / Elizabeth Tuazon Perez vs Bozena Krypel / Mared Vinas Lopez6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSamantha Dubeck / Heidi Ferrell vs Michele Penn / Catherine Whitaker6-4, 7-6
2026-04-10vs CCC MILLERLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelley Gilpin / Elizabeth Tuazon Perez vs Hillary Bintliff / Stacy Hamilton0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBryanna Roop / Heidi Ferrell vs Julie Diamond / Mindy Hegi2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-04-08vs CCC SKILLMAN/SPURGEONLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelley Gilpin / Tabitha Kane vs Christy Allen / Sarah Beeson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCourtney Hesse / Elizabeth Tuazon Perez vs Janie Skillman / Lindsey Kennemer4-6, 4-6
2026-03-26vs STC PALMER/HEITZWon 30
W#1 DoublesBree Mcalister / Elena Batsalkin vs Casey Palmer / Sally Stewart6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHeidi Ferrell / Bryanna Roop vs Laura Wiske / Taylor Dombroski6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Church / Kelley Gilpin vs Brooke Pazera / Brooke Thompson6-4, 6-4
2026-03-26vs MV SWIENTON/JACKSONWon 21
W#1 DoublesBree Mcalister / Elena Batsalkin vs Beth Beckwith / Melinda Rowland7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTabitha Kane vs Sara Gense3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSamantha Dubeck / Heidi Ferrell vs Emily Fine / Amy Jackson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-03-06vs RTC COOPER/FRIZZELLWon 30
W#1 DoublesElena Batsalkin / Bree Mcalister vs Deena Nutt / Gina Tallent6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTabitha Kane / Bryanna Roop vs Ruth Keller / Nancy Conner6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeidi Ferrell / Kelley Gilpin vs Andrea Ragsdale / Christie Steblein6-3, 6-4
2026-02-27vs CCC CORPENING/SURLESLost 01
L#2 DoublesCourtney Hesse / Bryanna Roop vs Erin Corpening / Megan Eubank4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Bianca Swegler
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 3.5
3.35
Yelena Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.30
Bree Mcalister
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.25
Courtney Hesse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Bryanna Roop
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Brandy Oetman
usually #2 Singles 42%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.96
Elizabeth Tuazon Perez
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Kelley Gilpin
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published
2.94
Tabitha Kane
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.91
Elena Batsalkin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Heidi Ferrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Laura Church
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Abbie Aubrey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Samantha Dubeck
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elena Batsalkin + Elizabeth Tuazon Perez5355% games+8.6% vs expected
Yelena Johnson + Bree Mcalister5159% games+7.8% vs expected
Heidi Ferrell + Brandy Oetman4254% games+6.5% vs expected
Tabitha Kane + Kelley Gilpin8353% games+2.5% vs expected
Bryanna Roop + Elena Batsalkin044 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Ferrell + Bree Mcalister404 matchesnot enough data
Bryanna Roop + Heidi Ferrell123 matchesnot enough data
Elena Batsalkin + Bree Mcalister303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bianca Swegler
16W–5L career · type S · 11 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
Yelena Johnson
10W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Bree Mcalister
23W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Courtney Hesse
13W–9L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Bryanna Roop
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
3
Brandy Oetman
35W–11L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
Elizabeth Tuazon Perez
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
Kelley Gilpin
17W–10L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
Tabitha Kane
14W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
2.94
Elena Batsalkin
10W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
73%27%<1%
2.91
Heidi Ferrell
31W–20L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
Laura Church
13W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Abbie Aubrey
0W–12L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
Samantha Dubeck
9W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.