Teams

Moore 18+ Singles

2026 South East Tennis Singles 18 & Over League · 3.0 Men 18 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-02-25vs Malone & PenningtonWon 30
W#1 SinglesValtteri Halonen vs Greg Malone6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRamon Aristy vs Ata Suanda6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesScott Serkin vs Chris Datesman2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-18vs Malone & PenningtonWon 21
L#1 SinglesScott Serkin vs Doug Vogt2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesValtteri Halonen vs Gregory Loehr6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesRamon Aristy vs Hunter Carpenter5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-16vs Malone & PenningtonWon 21
L#1 SinglesTodd Doroski vs Doug Vogt3-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesMatthew Messier vs Gregory Loehr6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesStuart Moore vs Chris Datesman6-3, 6-1
2026-01-26vs Malone & PenningtonWon 30
W#1 SinglesScott Serkin vs Matthew Ramirez6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRamon Aristy vs Rand Pennington6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesValtteri Halonen vs Ata Suanda6-3, 6-3
2026-01-17vs Malone & PenningtonWon 21
W#1 SinglesStuart Moore vs Matthew Ramirez6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMatthew Messier vs Greg Malone6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesRamon Aristy vs Chris Datesman6-2, 6-0
2026-01-14vs Malone & PenningtonWon 21
W#1 SinglesTodd Doroski vs Matthew Ramirez6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesValtteri Halonen vs Hunter Carpenter6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesMatthew Messier vs Doug Vogt3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Men 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Moore 18+ Singles7017411125
2Malone & Pennington0741735229

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Ramon Aristy
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 43% · published
3.07
Matthew Messier
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.96
Todd Doroski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.95
Valtteri Halonen
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.87
Scott Serkin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.85
Stuart Moore
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Serkin + Matthew Messier10270% games+11.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ramon Aristy
68W–38L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.14
Matthew Messier
31W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
Todd Doroski
22W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
Valtteri Halonen
17W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.95
Scott Serkin
42W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
2.87
Stuart Moore
39W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.