Teams

New Kids on the Block-Lorenzo

2024 Charlottesville Combo Mixed · Charlottesville Combo Mixed 7.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-06vs HEDS-EwingWon 10
W#1 DoublesMakenna Edgington / Marcello de Montbel vs Mary Broden / Zane Broden7-6, 6-2
2024-08-24vs BHSC-DavisLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlex de Montbel / Elyse Harris vs Billy Haley / Lauren Suggs1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMakenna Edgington / Paul Lorenzo vs Mary Voelmle / Ian Caskill2-6, 1-6
2024-08-19vs Forest Lakes Ace Kickers-JorgensenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlex de Montbel / Elyse Harris vs Rick Aasen / Heather Toombs3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMarcello de Montbel / Makenna Edgington vs Mary Manley / Mohan Nadkarni4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-08-10Split 11
W#1 DoublesMakenna Edgington / Ray Zuniga vs Paul Schmidt / Mary Beth Cancienne6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAlex de Montbel / Christina Lorenzo vs Beth Hollen / Christopher Hays6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-08-05vs BHSC-DavisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElyse Harris / Alex de Montbel vs Billy Haley / Gina Mancuso6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMakenna Edgington / Marcello de Montbel vs Ian Caskill / Mary Voelmle3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Combo Mixed 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Elyse Harris
published
3.98
Makenna Edgington
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.75
Alex de Montbel
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Tory Stribling
published
Marcello de Montbel
published
Megan Murr
published
Paul Lorenzo
published
Ray Zuniga
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elyse Harris + Alex de Montbel3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elyse Harris
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
4.05
4
Makenna Edgington
64W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Alex de Montbel
95W–42L career · 9 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
Tory Stribling
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
3
Christina Lorenzo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marcello de Montbel
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Murr
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Paul Lorenzo
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ray Zuniga
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.