← Teams

THPRD-Conroy/Brewer

2022 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Kristi Vargas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.42
Kevin Semonsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Michael Lavios
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Kathleen Budnick
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.21
Frank Brown
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.15
Richard Gronostajski
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Nora Semonsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Paul Best
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.77
Paul Kachel
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-05-28Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesNora Semonsen / Kevin Semonsen vs Pierre Burthey / Susan Judge6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Paul Best vs Scott Mayer / Betsy Henningsen6-1, 7-6
2022-05-22Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesFrank Brown / Kathleen Budnick vs Wei Pan / Rochelle Pluymers6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaul Kachel / Julie Mathews vs Kevin Muck / Maryann Velez0-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-14Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesFrank Brown / Kristi Vargas vs Matt Bolte / Gail Bolte6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Best / Kathleen Budnick vs Angela Addington / Larry Kaster6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNora Semonsen / Paul Kachel vs Emily Qi / Tony Humpage6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-07Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesMarianne Conroy / Michael Lavios vs Chresten Gram / Barbara Gram6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNora Semonsen / Paul Kachel vs Shelly Bigley / Clark Taylor7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKristi Vargas / Paul Best vs Catherine Leedy / John Magaddino6-1, 6-1
2022-05-06Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesNora Semonsen / Kevin Semonsen vs Hideko Kershaw / Masafumi Inoue6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJulia Rea / Richard Gronostajski vs Wes Milligan / Angie Lee6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKristi Vargas / Frank Brown vs Tonya Halog / Edmund Yuan6-3, 6-3
2022-04-16Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesKristi Vargas / Frank Brown vs Randy Boose / Barbara Ferre6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNora Semonsen / Paul Kachel vs Renee Schwartz / Ed Schwartz6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarianne Conroy / Richard Gronostajski vs Lori Vranizan / Paul Laurent6-3, 6-4
2022-04-03Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesPaul Kachel / Nora Semonsen vs Wes Milligan / Angie Lee6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPaul Best / Kathleen Budnick vs Diana Blebea / John Yu6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarianne Conroy / Michael Lavios vs Sandi Martes / Richard Jennings6-2, 6-1
2022-04-01Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesFrank Brown / Kristi Vargas vs Shawn Boyce / Jian Xu6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKathleen Budnick / Paul Best vs Hoon Shin / Seungja Shin6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJulia Rea / Richard Gronostajski vs Ellen Hodges / William Pinelli6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kristi Vargas
82W–131L career
0%99%1%
3.78
3.5
Kevin Semonsen
48W–44L career
0%91%9%
3.42
3.5
Michael Lavios
30W–56L career
2%89%8%
3.33
3.5
Kathleen Budnick
138W–170L career
0%98%2%
3.32
3
Frank Brown
115W–69L career
0%20%80%
3.21
3.5
Richard Gronostajski
90W–91L career
6%94%0%
3.15
3
Nora Semonsen
47W–70L career
1%90%9%
2.86
3
Paul Best
46W–76L career
0%97%3%
2.86
3
Paul Kachel
19W–29L career
7%87%6%
2.77

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.