Teams

CWasko

2022 Capital Summer 40 & Over Singles League · 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-08-13Won 10
W#2 SinglesChris Wasko vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-07vs DHillWon 20
W#1 SinglesLance Williams vs Sean Krause7-5, 6-0
W#2 SinglesChris Wasko vs Duane Hall3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-08-04vs JHulicki 40+ 3.5Split 11
L#2 SinglesChris Wasko vs John Hulicki4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesLance Williams vs David Clark7-6, 6-2
2022-07-23vs BRoss/BTownsendSplit 11
L#1 SinglesPaul Brinckerhoff vs David Roberts3-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesEvan Fultz vs Rex Bickley6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-17Won 10
W#2 SinglesPaul Brinckerhoff vs David Kelly6-3, 6-3
2022-07-03vs DHillLost 02
L#1 SinglesChris Wasko vs Howard Critcher4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesEvan Fultz vs Sean Krause4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-06-26vs JStieglerWon 10
W#2 SinglesLance Williams vs James Stiegler6-3, 6-1
2022-06-19Lost 01
L#2 SinglesPaul Brinckerhoff vs Matthew Hilbert2-6, 2-6
2022-06-12vs JGouveiaWon 20
W#1 SinglesPaul Brinckerhoff vs John Gouveia0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesEvan Fultz vs John Cleary6-2, 6-3
2022-06-05Lost 12
L#1 SinglesPaul Brinckerhoff vs David Roberts0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesLance Williams vs Jason Hill6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesEvan Fultz vs James Wu1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Chris Wasko
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Lance Williams
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.21
Evan Fultz
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
West Ludwig
published
3.19
Paul Brinckerhoff
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Jason Widen
published
2.62
Thomas Belch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lance Williams + Paul Brinckerhoff3249% gamesnot enough data
Paul Brinckerhoff + Evan Fultz134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Wasko
91W–84L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
Lance Williams
81W–80L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Evan Fultz
115W–110L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
West Ludwig
8W–21L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Paul Brinckerhoff
93W–99L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Jason Widen
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
Thomas Belch
4W–15L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.