Teams

Kirby 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 40 & Over Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesKimberly Halsey / Cynthia Sarwi vs Catherine Egerton / Karyn Efird7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLeanne Rosenbower / Lynne Murray vs Maggie Riley / Lee Varner6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLaura Vary / Kimberly Eberhard vs Sarah Joplin / Britt Flanagan5-7, 5-7
L#1 Doublessilvina piotti / Alina Vannavong vs Jill Perez / Deborah DiNoto6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathryn Fleihan / Lynne Murray vs Joyce Perez / Denise Fiery6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMargaret Joseph / Kimberly Eberhard vs Alice Procter / Bonita Johnson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-12vs Beck 40s 7.5W Combo Wed PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesCynthia Sarwi / Kimberly Halsey vs Anita Allis / Gwen Highsmith-Quick7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlicia Noone / Alina Vannavong vs Kimberly Lancaster / Kathy Chinnis6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTrisha Kirby / Diane Majestic vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings15 teams · 7.5 40 & Over Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Lynne Murray
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.70
Diane Majestic
published 4
3.64
Alicia Noone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Cynthia Sarwi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Kimberly Eberhard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Leanne Rosenbower
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Alina Vannavong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.50
silvina piotti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Kimberly Halsey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Laura Vary
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Margaret Joseph
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Trisha Kirby
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Kathryn Fleihan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ginger Hayworth
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Halsey + Alina Vannavong5063% games+12.6% vs expected
Lynne Murray + Ginger Hayworth5259% gamesnot enough data
Lynne Murray + Diane Majestic2452% gamesnot enough data
Diane Majestic + Ginger Hayworth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynne Murray
161W–88L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Diane Majestic
204W–63L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.70
4
Alicia Noone
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Cynthia Sarwi
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.63
Kimberly Eberhard
9W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.61
Leanne Rosenbower
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Alina Vannavong
56W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
silvina piotti
14W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
Kimberly Halsey
57W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Laura Vary
23W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Margaret Joseph
16W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Trisha Kirby
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
Kathryn Fleihan
30W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
Ginger Hayworth
88W–42L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.