Teams

BmoreCha 9.0 18x

2025 Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over · Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.33 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-22vs ONLY FANS 2.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesHenry McVeigh / Anne Tobin vs KHOURY ZIAD / Eboni Lance6-1, 6-0
2025-03-14vs ONLY FANS 2.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesFarzaneh Navid / Farooq Iqbal vs Vicki Williamson / Anthony Carle6-3, 7-6
2025-03-01vs ONLY FANS 2.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesFarzaneh Navid / Michael Liu vs Kaitlyn Heo / David Trang6-1, 6-2
2025-02-21vs ONLY FANS 2.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesMaureen Kolb / Jeison de Guzman vs Eve Helmer / Dat Doan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFarzaneh Navid / Michael Liu vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-07vs ONLY FANS 2.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesFarzaneh Navid / Michael Liu vs Vicki Williamson / David Trang6-1, 6-3
2025-01-25vs ONLY FANS 2.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesFarzaneh Navid / Henry McVeigh vs Vicki Williamson / Anthony Carle6-2, 6-4
2025-01-17Won 10
W#3 DoublesMaureen Kolb / Henry McVeigh vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-01-10vs ONLY FANS 2.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesArina Kravitz / Henry McVeigh vs David Trang / Kaitlyn Heo4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.56
Henry McVeigh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.27
Maureen Kolb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
Maraya Pratt
published
4.13
Jeison de Guzman
published
4.12
Anne Tobin
published 4.5
4.08
Arina Kravitz
published 4.5
4.08
Farzaneh Navid
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.99
Michael Vaughan
published
3.94
Farooq Iqbal
published
3.94
Henry Cha
published
3.90
Susan Rhee
published
3.79
Elizabeth Larson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Henry McVeigh
170W–51L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
4.56
4.5
Maureen Kolb
119W–83L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Maraya Pratt
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
4.13
Jeison de Guzman
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.13
4.5
Anne Tobin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.12
4.5
Arina Kravitz
19W–26L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
4.08
4
Farzaneh Navid
117W–111L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.08
Michael Vaughan
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.99
Farooq Iqbal
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.94
Henry Cha
25W–47L career · no lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
3.94
Susan Rhee
32W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Christopher Morphew
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Elizabeth Larson
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.