Teams

55Netchix

2022 Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.80 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-20vs The Seasoned Vicious VolliesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Arthur / Susanne Mendiola vs Bennie Blackley / Carol Humphrey2-6, 1-6
2022-06-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesSusanne Mendiola / Jennifer Arthur vs Karen Robinson / Daphne Summers6-3, 6-3
2022-05-18vs Jacobson/LaabsWon 10
W#3 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Ann Traxler vs Kelley Israel / SanYvette Williams6-1, 6-1
2022-05-12vs SweeneyWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusanne Mendiola / Jennifer Arthur vs Veronica Townsend / Helen Patterson5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-05-01vs The Seasoned Vicious VolliesLost 01
L#2 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Ann Traxler vs Janette O Logan / Jennifer Noronha5-7, 2-6
2022-04-23vs B&B BuddiesWon 10
W#3 DoublesRosalie Hooper / Ann Traxler vs Cathy Bulkley / Masako Murphy4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Susanne Mendiola
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.71
Diana Heinze
published 4
3.71
Hedy Brandt
published 4
3.49
Joan Ferrell
published
3.46
Katherine Hare
published
3.40
Jennifer Arthur
published
3.38
Deborah Pugh
published 3.5
3.18
Rosalie Hooper
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jeannie Park
published
Lily Openshaw
published
Nina Davis
published
Tammy Bowie
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Ferrell + Diana Heinze4446% games−10.1% vs expected
Lily Openshaw + Jeannie Park404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Susanne Mendiola
59W–36L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Diana Heinze
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Hedy Brandt
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Joan Ferrell
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
Katherine Hare
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.46
Jennifer Arthur
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Deborah Pugh
15W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
3.38
3.5
Rosalie Hooper
188W–181L career · 9 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Jeannie Park
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lily Openshaw
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nina Davis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tammy Bowie
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.