← Teams

Gonzalez (Granada Tennis)

2021 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Spring Day · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.07 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-03-26vs Terrazas (Morgan Levy Park)Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesAna Rubin / Helen Picard vs Valentina Urdaneta / Yersika Fernandez Labrador5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-03-19vs Suchman (Alper JCC)Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesCheryl Levin / Helen Picard vs Sharon Singh / Jackie Thayer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2021-03-12Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesHelen Picard / Doris Ruiz vs Leti Martell / Cristina Blanco1-6, 3-6
2021-02-26vs Miami-Dade - TeamFormanLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesHelen Picard / Gloria Suarez-Sanchez vs Ana Tirado / Marisabel de la Mora Villarroel2-6, 3-6
2021-02-19vs Banciella (Continental)Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Nathan / Chie-Mie Chyung vs Connie Goodman-Milone / Maria H Dominguez6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-02-12vs Porter (Deering Bay)Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesHelen Picard / Gloria Suarez-Sanchez vs Joann Feldman / Jessie Wolfson6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPatricia Nathan / Doris Ruiz vs Amy Shapiro / Nancy Michelson6-3, 6-2
2021-02-05vs Plaza (Flamingo Park)Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesHelen Picard / Carole Bernstein vs Marcia Montoya / Hetty van de Kreeke6-2, 6-0
2021-01-22vs Team Forman2 (Kendalltown)Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesEve-Alice Stoller / Patricia Nathan vs Carol Knotts / Ileana Guzman7-6, 6-1
2021-01-15vs Crowley (Shula's)Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesHelen Picard / Carole Bernstein vs Sara Contreras / Virginia Siegel7-5, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Eve-Alice Stoller
published 3.5
2.83
Patricia Nathan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —
2.77
2.76
Carole Bernstein
published 3
2.60
Cheryl Levin
published 3
2.58
2.54
AnaElena Multach
published 3
2.47
Chie-Mie Chyung
published 3
2.39
Helen Picard
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Angelica Sintes + Gloria Suarez-Sanchez2–348% games−1.8% vs expected
Patricia Nathan + Helen Picard1–23 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Nathan + Chie-Mie Chyung1–23 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eve-Alice Stoller
1W–6L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
—
Patricia Nathan
28W–44L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Gloria Suarez-Sanchez
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Carole Bernstein
26W–21L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Cheryl Levin
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
21%78%<1%
2.60
—
Maria Angelica Sintes
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
2.58
3
AnaElena Multach
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
2.54
3
Chie-Mie Chyung
26W–85L career · type A · no lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
2.47
3
Helen Picard
26W–37L career · 7 lines in 2021
80%20%<1%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.