← Teams

SHC-Francis/Minor

2020 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Linda Mertz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Kathleen Francis
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Results5 ties
2019-11-09Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKathleen Francis / Brooke Thompson vs Sandra Ellis / Julie Bradford5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Mertz / Kathy Schaub vs Peggy Hampton / Beth Kempton7-5, 6-0
2019-10-27Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesCate Minor / Kathleen Francis vs Leslie Rosenberg / Kim Tellin6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKathy Schaub / Linda Mertz vs Jeannette Martinez / Ann Hays6-0, 6-3
2019-10-19Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Francis / Kathy Schaub vs Sarah Bradley / Jeralyn Snellgrove6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2019-10-04Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Francis / Cate Minor vs Jayne Mitchell / Shelly Cruze1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Mertz / Marcie Price vs Patricia Campbell / Kristi Tompkins6-4, 6-3
2019-09-06Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Francis / Cate Minor vs Sheila Schmidt / Caryn Cohen6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Linda Mertz
19W–20L career
not enough data
—
3
Kathleen Francis
16W–12L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.