Teams

Seminole Lake Smash Girls

2025 Pinellas Adult 55 & Over Weekend Winter · 7.0 W Saturday

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-15vs McMullen KelseyWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Higgins / Tisha Maddaloni vs Terry Lawrence / Suzanne Gardner6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesNessie Haideri / Tisha Maddaloni vs Tammy Miller / Leah Knapp6-1, 6-2
2025-02-08vs Pinellas/Vogeley/55&Over7.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesTricia Honeycutt / Cindy Ferguson vs Emily Signoracci / Sheri Couch7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSherrl Fry / Kristen Pierce vs Nancy Patchen / Theresa Whiddon6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJanuary Moennig / Cynthia Pilarski vs Marci Kay / Pamela Cotillo1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Tisha Maddaloni
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Beth Higgins
published 3.5
3.33
Cynthia Pilarski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Tricia Honeycutt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Arlene Fricke
published 3.5
Caroline Stupple
published 3.5
Cindy Ferguson
published 3.5
3.24
Carol Vitelli
published 3.5
3.14
January Moennig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Dolores Salazar
published
3.06
Kristen Pierce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Kim Poynter
published
Jayne Lewis
published
Nessie Haideri
published
Sherrl Fry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tisha Maddaloni
68W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Beth Higgins
12W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Cynthia Pilarski
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Tricia Honeycutt
65W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Arlene Fricke
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Caroline Stupple
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Cindy Ferguson
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carol Vitelli
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
January Moennig
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
Dolores Salazar
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Kristen Pierce
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Kim Poynter
31W–15L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
Jayne Lewis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nessie Haideri
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sherrl Fry
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.