Teams

Racqueteers

2024 Prince Georges Combo · Prince Georges Combo 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.29 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-11-22vs Lady Acers 6.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesLorena Alfaro / Yngrid Sierra vs Tosha Clark / LaTonya Young-Clayborne4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesReena Sethi / Cindy Pohoryles vs LaShel Baravechia / Pamela Martin7-5, 6-3
2024-11-03vs Lady Acers 6.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesAmber Surmiller / Meghan Smith vs Danielle Gourdine / Grace Gourdine6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesYngrid Sierra / Eveline Shum vs Jacinda Johnson / LaShel Baravechia4-6, 0-6
2024-11-02vs Serving YouWon 10
W#3 DoublesYngrid Sierra / Gail Martinez Waters vs Angela Curry / Staci Steward6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-10-27vs Serving YouWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatherine Dodson / Meghan Smith vs Alecia Brinkley / Staci Steward6-0, 6-4
2024-10-20vs Lady Acers 6.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesAmber Surmiller / Lorena Alfaro vs Pamela Martin / Annette James6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRuth Go Fernando Randle / Anna-Karina Caudevilla vs Obire Owinje / Gay Trinkner6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-10-06vs Serving YouWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarina Villagra / Anna-Karina Caudevilla vs Deana Stamper / Leslie Fields6-3, 6-1
2024-10-04vs Lady Acers 6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKatherine Dodson / Anna-Karina Caudevilla vs Ebla Aliibrahim / LaShel Baravechia4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesReena Sethi / Lorena Alfaro vs Jacinda Johnson / Rise Lancoon6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBrittany Hickbottom / Gail Martinez Waters vs Trish Fulcher / Aklil Getachew2-6, 3-6
2024-09-29vs Serving YouSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAmber Surmiller / Anna-Karina Caudevilla vs Deborah Thompson / Leslie Fields5-6
W#3 DoublesCarina Villagra / Lorena Alfaro vs Angela Curry / Staci Steward6-0, 6-4
2024-09-22vs Lady Acers 6.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesCathy Robertson / Lorena Alfaro vs Tosha Clark / Rebecca Sellassie6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesReena Sethi / Pamela KANSTOROOM vs Trish Fulcher / Tjuana Jenkins6-2, 6-0
2024-09-20vs Serving YouSplit 11
W#2 DoublesRuth Go Fernando Randle / Lorena Alfaro vs Deana Stamper / Leslie Fields6-3, 6-5
L#3 DoublesCindy Pohoryles / Gail Martinez Waters vs Shalita Williams / Donna Pearson5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Cathy Robertson
published 4
3.47
Meghan Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Sheila O'Connell
published
3.31
Pamela KANSTOROOM
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Amber Surmiller
published 3.5
3.20
3.18
Carina Villagra
published 3.5
3.15
Katherine Dodson
published
3.12
Yngrid Sierra
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Anna-Karina Caudevilla
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Lorena Alfaro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Cindy Pohoryles
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Gail Martinez Waters
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Eveline Shum
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eveline Shum + Anna-Karina Caudevilla2537% games−17.6% vs expected
Katherine Dodson + Carina Villagra134 matchesnot enough data
Yngrid Sierra + Lorena Alfaro123 matchesnot enough data
Sheila O'Connell + Carina Villagra213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy Robertson
16W–18L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Meghan Smith
160W–93L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Sheila O'Connell
25W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Pamela KANSTOROOM
102W–60L career · 1 line in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Amber Surmiller
22W–37L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Ruth Go Fernando Randle
21W–18L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Carina Villagra
16W–16L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Katherine Dodson
44W–68L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Yngrid Sierra
165W–232L career · 3 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Anna-Karina Caudevilla
64W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Lorena Alfaro
134W–151L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Cindy Pohoryles
56W–96L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Brittany Hickbottom
21W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Gail Martinez Waters
47W–66L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Eveline Shum
46W–87L career · 5 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.