Teams

JVarn (Palisades)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 9.5 Women - Thurs PM

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-05vs DThayaprasat (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY / Krisztina Szukob vs Carson Rose Tennyson / Becky Tennyson2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-09-28vs JSteyl (OPRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY / Lina Clarke vs Sharon Gehrig / Kristin Hennessy4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-09-21vs DWest (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY / Krisztina Szukob vs Kindell Schmitt / Natalie Osman3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLina Clarke / Jennifer Sopel vs Samantha Danesis / Diana West0-1, 0-0
2023-09-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesLina Clarke / Krisztina Szukob vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-14vs DThayaprasat (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLina Clarke / MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY vs Hannah English Rahill / Sarah Cimmino3-6, 2-6
2023-08-31vs DWest (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY / Jennifer Sopel vs Kindell Schmitt / Natalie Osman0-6, 4-6
2023-08-17vs JSteyl (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJordan Bowers / MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY vs Kristen Montgomery / Jennifer Fayad3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-08-10vs DWest (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY / Lina Clarke vs Melissa Potier / Kindell Schmitt6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 9.5 Women - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.30
Lina Clarke
published 4.5
Krisztina Szukob
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Jessica Varn
published 4.5
4.18
Jennifer Sopel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.07
Alison Lacy Sherrill
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.83
Elizabeth McCombs
published
Jordan Bowers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jessica Varn + Lina Clarke3355% games−1.2% vs expected
Lina Clarke + MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY2546% gamesnot enough data
MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY + Krisztina Szukob224 matchesnot enough data
Alison Lacy Sherrill + Jessica Varn303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY
45W–31L career · type A · 7 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Lina Clarke
66W–47L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Krisztina Szukob
23W–13L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Jessica Varn
34W–23L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.20
Jennifer Sopel
76W–63L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Alison Lacy Sherrill
33W–38L career · 6 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
4.07
Elizabeth McCombs
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
88%12%<1%
3.83
Jordan Bowers
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.