Teams

CMcKiernan (Raintree)

2025 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-03vs JHerlong/Ocallaghan (FCC)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesCiara McKiernan / Tricia Shaw vs Lorna O'Callaghan / Danielle Shealy5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMargot Bizon / Jenny Carlson vs TARA RAND / Elizabeth Kyle1-6, 3-6
2025-09-19Won 10
W#1 DoublesCiara McKiernan / Meagan Dorst vs Katie Nelson / Lauren Pelletier7-5, 6-3
2025-09-12vs JWoodruff (CSRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMargot Bizon / Kristen Eshleman vs Martha Kinney / Charlotte Haydon3-6, 1-6
2025-09-05vs TRogovin (JCC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesMeagan Dorst / Ciara McKiernan vs Caryn Craige / Lauren Fine6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMargot Bizon / Jenny Carlson vs Sandi Lovell / Amy Altieri1-6, 2-6
2025-08-29vs EPease (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKatie Eggers / Ciara McKiernan vs Kim Sheehey / Katie Bissett5-7, 1-6
2025-08-27vs CAckels (PCC)Split 11
W#1 DoublesCiara McKiernan / Meagan Dorst vs Carla Ackels / Kimberly French6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesNicole Love / Margot Bizon vs Amy Eades / Michele Messmer2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Katie Eggers
published
3.07
Meagan Dorst
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Stacy Andrews
published
2.98
Christine Demille
published 3.5
2.96
Tricia Shaw
published
2.82
Ciara McKiernan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.76
Kelley Baughman
published
2.73
Margot Bizon
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.69
Nicole Love
published
2.50
Jenny Carlson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Shaw + Katie Eggers4159% games+21.5% vs expected
Ciara McKiernan + Meagan Dorst4352% games+5.8% vs expected
Stacy Andrews + Tricia Shaw213 matchesnot enough data
Margot Bizon + Jenny Carlson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Eggers
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.12
3.5
Meagan Dorst
32W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Stacy Andrews
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.00
3.5
Christine Demille
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Tricia Shaw
17W–19L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.96
3
Ciara McKiernan
59W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.82
Kelley Baughman
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Margot Bizon
52W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Nicole Love
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%9%91%
2.69
Jenny Carlson
1W–12L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.