Teams

WGCC

2025 Montgomery Doubles Winter Women · Montgomery Doubles Winter 4.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-26vs The EdgeLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Means / Beth Yoder vs Raina Fishbane / Cheng Hoon Lim4-6, 4-6
2025-03-20vs Congressional 4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJill Burke / Kathleen Ricchetti vs Melanie Caudron / Kary Magruder2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPamela Poth / Lisa Nardini vs Christy Giulieri / Lauren Johnston1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Yoder / Maura Mccool vs PAMELA BOLAND / Lynda Suffoletta3-6, 3-6
2025-03-10vs Power SmashLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Means / Brigid Brakefield vs Anto Faini / Ellen Lee1-6, 2-6
2025-03-06vs Callahan/KoeleLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Means / Beth Yoder vs Peggy Koele / Tonya Crosley2-6, 3-6
2025-02-14vs Tennis SharksLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrigid Brakefield / Lisa Means vs Caroline Mountcastle / Brittany Persino2-6, 2-6
2025-01-17vs Smart Aces 4.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Moore / Gillian Curran vs Judy Engelson / Melissa Hampton2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrigid Brakefield / Valerie Penney vs Robin Birchfield / Diane Fletcher1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPamela Poth / Elizabeth Savage vs Christy Hinckley / Bobbi Shoop5-7, 6-3
2025-01-09vs BCC AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Zidlicky / Katherine Price vs Kay Han / Jill Lavin6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Ricchetti / Lisa Nardini vs Patricia Rose / Kirsten Propst6-7, 4-2
L#3 DoublesJackie Chipman / Valerie Penney vs Kim Rehmann / Sandy Horowitz2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Winter 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Kathleen Ricchetti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Jill Burke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Gillian Curran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Sarah Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Beth Yoder
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Allison Zidlicky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Brigid Brakefield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Lisa Means
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Elizabeth Savage
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jackie Chipman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katherine Price
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Nardini
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Maura Mccool
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Poth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Valerie Penney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Ricchetti
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Jill Burke
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Gillian Curran
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Sarah Moore
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Beth Yoder
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Allison Zidlicky
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Brigid Brakefield
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Lisa Means
46W–131L career · 10 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
Elizabeth Savage
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jackie Chipman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Price
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Nardini
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maura Mccool
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Pamela Poth
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Valerie Penney
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.