Teams

Kezman

2024 Norfolk Combo · Norfolk Combo 8.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-21vs ClaxtonWon 20
W#2 DoublesLexi Rawls / Stacy Hennessy vs Katherine Claxton / Sheryl Harris6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAnastasia Kezman / Tijen Ireland vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-05vs ClaxtonWon 10
W#2 DoublesTijen Ireland / Yoko Fukuda vs Michella Newton / Kimberly McClernon6-0, 6-2
2024-09-30vs ClaxtonLost 02
L#1 DoublesLexi Rawls / Stacy Hennessy vs Michella Newton / Lisa Green6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTijen Ireland / Rycy Godette vs Shelley Smith / Sheryl Harris4-6, 1-6
2024-09-16vs ClaxtonWon 10
W#2 DoublesLexi Rawls / Megan Behrns vs Mart-Mari von Schlichting / Sheryl Harris2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Norfolk Combo 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.00 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Courtney Violette
published 4.5
4.04
Claire Walters
published 4
4.04
Deborah Brewster
published 4.5
4.01
Lexi Rawls
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.01
Rycy Godette
published
3.94
Lisa Deaver
published
3.88
Tijen Ireland
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.79
Anastasia Kezman
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
Megan Behrns
published
Stacy Hennessy
published
Yoko Fukuda
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anastasia Kezman + Tijen Ireland6455% games−3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Courtney Violette
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
4.26
4
Claire Walters
25W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
4.04
4.5
Deborah Brewster
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Lexi Rawls
80W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
4.01
Rycy Godette
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
4.01
Lisa Deaver
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Tijen Ireland
83W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Anastasia Kezman
128W–47L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.79
Megan Behrns
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stacy Hennessy
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Yoko Fukuda
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.