Teams

PLEASANTON 40AM3.5C

2022 ADULT 40&Over · Men's 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.55 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-03-26vs PLEASANTON 40AM3.5EWon 10
W#2 DoublesNilo Clava / Nimesh Gandhi vs Baskaran Gopalan / Velmurugan Subramanian6-4, 6-4
2022-02-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Lipnicke / Nimesh Gandhi vs Patrick Chan / Alex Flores5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-02-13vs CROW CANYON CC 40AM3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesNimesh Gandhi / Thomas Lee vs David Perun / Matt Lourens6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-31vs FREMONT TC 40AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesNimesh Gandhi / Bob Garrett vs Ravindra Samson / Nithin Ravanikar6-3, 6-0
2022-01-29vs PLEASANTON 40AM3.5ELost 01
L#1 DoublesNimesh Gandhi / Thomas Lee vs Praba Mathiyazhagan / Krishna Shanmugam3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
David Lipnicke
published 4
3.57
Dan Helmer
published 3.5
3.49
Thinh Vo
published
3.44
Alexander Michael
published 3.5
3.36
Nimesh Gandhi
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.35
Jonathan Indick
published
3.31
Andrey Izmaylov
published 3.5
3.30
Mark Vella
published 3.5
3.27
Edison Barco
published 3.5
3.26
Jeff Gear
published
Eric Boehm
published 3.5
3.24
Carlo Guariento
published 3.5
3.21
Nilo Clava
published
3.15
Sergio Castillo
published
3.11
Doug van Slyke
published 3.5
3.08
Kyle Jones
published
3.00
Rob Corder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Vella + Dan Helmer314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Lipnicke
12W–18L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Dan Helmer
37W–14L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.57
Thinh Vo
13W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Alexander Michael
19W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Nimesh Gandhi
147W–82L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
Jonathan Indick
19W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Andrey Izmaylov
8W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Mark Vella
31W–40L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Edison Barco
13W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Jeff Gear
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Eric Boehm
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Carlo Guariento
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Nilo Clava
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Sergio Castillo
10W–12L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Doug van Slyke
8W–22L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Kyle Jones
9W–18L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Rob Corder
10W–9L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.