Teams

Hickory Springs (Mary Hughes)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Robin Schorr)

14 players · average NTRP 3.90 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-01-16vs Seven Hills (Megan White)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCheryl Shelby / Marisa Mikals vs Jenny Eberhard / Shawna Floyd1-6, 6-4, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Hagerman / Kimberly McTaggart vs Megan White / Tedi Petito4-6, 4-6
2024-12-12vs Post Oak Rec (Lisa Ray)*Lost 13
L#1 DoublesMarisa Mikals / Cheryl Shelby vs Ashley Lotz / Kirti Dahiya3-6, 6-4, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJennifer Dennard vs Lisa Thornton1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Downer / Carrie Wilbanks vs Sarah Grasso / Katie Reid6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAshley Diemer / Kim Avery vs Shannon Creasman / Jessica Nagle2-6, 6-3, 6-7
L#1 DoublesMarisa Mikals / Cheryl Shelby vs Yvette Williams / Kelly Roberts6-3, 2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Dennard vs Michong Holmes1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Powers / Karen Williams vs Beth Yates / Tammy Sisco2-6, 2-2
L#3 DoublesCallie Fuller / Kimberly McTaggart vs Robin Wilkinson / Tracey Byrne1-6, 6-4, 3-6
W#4 DoublesAshley Diemer / Tara Lutes vs Cinda Hamilton / Mary Kang2-6, 6-2, 6-4
2024-11-21vs Marietta CC (Catherine Leggett)*Lost 05
L#1 DoublesMarisa Mikals / Cheryl Shelby vs Ann Bradley Almy / Pamela Cleaver2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJennifer Dennard vs Catherine Leggett6-4, 5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Downer / Carrie Wilbanks vs Peggy McNeel / JULIA Miltiades4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTara Lutes / Kimberly Hagerman vs Chrystal Campbell / Megan McNeel3-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesMary Hughes / Ashley Diemer vs Kelly Krivsky / Pamela Watt4-6, 2-6
2024-11-18vs Windsor Oaks (Karen Pline)*Won 32
W#1 DoublesCarrie Wilbanks / Marisa Mikals vs Kary Eaton / Jennifer Piendel2-6, 6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJennifer Dennard vs Sara Coker6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKimberly Hagerman / Cheryl Shelby vs Lisa Link / Nancy Janas2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTara Lutes / Kimberly McTaggart vs Karen Pline / Melanie Williams7-6, 6-1
L#4 DoublesAshley Diemer / Heather Osterink vs Nina Chopra / Maki Delaney4-6, 1-6
2024-11-07vs Fullers Park (Karyn Thistlewood)*Won 31
W#1 DoublesCheryl Shelby / Marisa Mikals vs Paula Lins / Joan Korowitz6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJennifer Dennard vs Jackie Cross6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKimberly Hagerman / Carrie Wilbanks vs Joan Nichols / Deborah Meagher6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCallie Fuller / Kimberly McTaggart vs Karyn Thistlewood / Carla Poore7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Robin Schorr) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Heather Powers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Callie Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Cheryl Shelby
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.70
Lisa Downer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Kimberly Hagerman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.67
Marisa Mikals
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Carrie Wilbanks
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
Tara Lutes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Heather Osterink
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dawn Ehorn
published
Jennifer Dennard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Kim Avery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly McTaggart
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Hughes
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Wilbanks + Lisa Downer17269% games+15.7% vs expected
Mary Hughes + Kim Avery11358% games+9.5% vs expected
Marisa Mikals + Cheryl Shelby5748% games+2.8% vs expected
Kimberly Hagerman + Tara Lutes1736% games−5.8% vs expected
Mary Hughes + Heather Osterink0735% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Hagerman + Mary Hughes033 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Hagerman + Heather Powers213 matchesnot enough data
Heather Osterink + Tara Lutes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heather Powers
14W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Callie Fuller
18W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Cheryl Shelby
13W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
Lisa Downer
39W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Kimberly Hagerman
22W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Marisa Mikals
14W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Carrie Wilbanks
69W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
Tara Lutes
10W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Heather Osterink
16W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Dawn Ehorn
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Dennard
29W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Avery
11W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly McTaggart
10W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Hughes
13W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.