Teams

Shelor

2023 Anne Arundel Adult 65 & Over · Anne Arundel 65 & Over 8.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.71 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-22vs O'LaughlinLost 01
L#3 DoublesElyse Jacob / Kristina Shelor vs Patt Haun / Carol Olaughlin5-7, 3-5
2023-06-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesAlice Hume / Kristina Shelor vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-08vs O'LaughlinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristina Shelor / Diane Bohr vs Mesanie Lee / Patt Haun1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Fritz / Terri Mrozinski vs Nancy Rase / Elizabeth Mehl6-1, 6-0
2023-06-01vs O'LaughlinWon 20
W#1 DoublesElyse Jacob / Stephanie Mills vs Maria Birnkammer / Mesanie Lee6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTeresa Adams / Sharon Tennyson vs Elizabeth Mehl / Donna Worthington7-5, 7-6
2023-05-18vs O'LaughlinWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Mills / Terri Mrozinski vs Maria Birnkammer / Masako Murphy3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-11vs O'LaughlinLost 01
L#1 DoublesTerri Mrozinski / Sharon Tennyson vs Maria Birnkammer / Elizabeth Mehl3-6, 6-7
2023-05-04vs O'LaughlinSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElyse Jacob / Stephanie Mills vs Nancy Rase / Donna Worthington6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDiane Bohr / Sharon Tennyson vs Carol Olaughlin / Mesanie Lee1-6, 1-6
2023-04-27vs O'LaughlinLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Mills / Terri Mrozinski vs Patt Haun / Mesanie Lee2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel 65 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Elyse Jacob
published 4
Hiroyo Fisher
published 4
3.71
Hedy Brandt
published 4
3.69
Courtenay Culp
published 4
3.46
Katherine Hare
published
3.43
Sharon Tennyson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Terri Mrozinski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Teresa Adams
published
2.90
Kristina Shelor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Stephanie Mills
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristina Shelor + Terri Mrozinski123 matchesnot enough data
Hedy Brandt + Courtenay Culp303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elyse Jacob
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Hiroyo Fisher
23W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Hedy Brandt
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Courtenay Culp
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
Katherine Hare
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Sharon Tennyson
185W–142L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.43
3.5
Terri Mrozinski
366W–431L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Teresa Adams
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.22
3
Kristina Shelor
41W–65L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
Stephanie Mills
37W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.