Teams

TTC - Thomas 3.0 40s Spring

2025 Tuscaloosa USTA Adult Spring Weeknight 40&over · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.80 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-21vs TU - SandrasLost 12
L#1 DoublesLinda Lee / Leigh Wright vs Stanislava Chtarbanova / Holly Collins1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Thomas / Rene Sheffield vs Cari Sandras / Linda Canterbury7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJenifer Spears / Debra Burroughs vs Pamela Welbourne / Ciana Ortiguera1-6, 1-6
2025-05-19vs TU - SandrasLost 02
L#1 DoublesJenifer Spears / Debra Burroughs vs Cari Sandras / Stanislava Chtarbanova0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTricia Murphy / Linda Lee vs Alison Phillips / Holly Collins3-6, 4-6
2025-05-14vs TU - SandrasLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiana Torres / Jenifer Spears vs Carol Mills / Brandi LaBresh1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Lee / Debra Burroughs vs Cari Sandras / Alison Phillips7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTricia Murphy / Beth Thomas vs Pasquale Tosyali / Susan Whitley5-7, 2-6
2025-05-07vs TU - SandrasLost 13
L#1 DoublesLee Embry / Linda Lee vs Carol Mills / Ciana Ortiguera1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBeth Thomas vs Holly Collins2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Burroughs / Tricia Murphy vs Stanislava Chtarbanova / Pamela Welbourne1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLeigh Wright / Diana Torres vs Susan Whitley / Linda Canterbury3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-05vs TU - SandrasLost 04
L#1 DoublesLoWanda James / Jenifer Spears vs Ciana Ortiguera / Linda Canterbury3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBeth Thomas vs Holly Collins1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLee Embry / Leigh Wright vs Stanislava Chtarbanova / Jessica Cicatiello1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRene Sheffield / Diana Torres vs Carol Mills / Alison Phillips7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-30vs TU - SandrasLost 04
L#1 DoublesDebra Burroughs / Linda Lee vs Cari Sandras / Stanislava Chtarbanova1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDiana Torres vs Ciana Ortiguera1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJenifer Spears / Tricia Murphy vs Alison Phillips / Jessica Cicatiello2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLoWanda James / Leigh Killian vs Susan Whitley / Holly Collins1-6, 3-6
2025-04-16vs TU - SandrasLost 04
L#1 DoublesLeigh Wright / Leigh Killian vs Carol Mills / Ciana Ortiguera1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJenifer Spears vs Stanislava Chtarbanova2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDebra Burroughs / Diana Torres vs Cari Sandras / Pasquale Tosyali2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Thomas / JAMIE LAMBERT vs Jessica Cicatiello / Linda Canterbury3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Tricia Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.68
JAMIE LAMBERT
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Rene Sheffield
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.67
Leigh Wright
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Cindy Gilmore
published 3
2.60
Jenifer Spears
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.53
Leigh Killian
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.47
Debra Burroughs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
Lee Embry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.37
LoWanda James
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Diana Torres
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.18
Beth Thomas
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Thomas + Jenifer Spears4158% games+18.1% vs expected
Tricia Murphy + Jenifer Spears1448% games+3.6% vs expected
Debra Burroughs + Jenifer Spears1440% games+3.0% vs expected
Tricia Murphy + Debra Burroughs044 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Murphy + Beth Thomas224 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Gilmore + Leigh Wright134 matchesnot enough data
Leigh Killian + Leigh Wright224 matchesnot enough data
Tricia Murphy + JAMIE LAMBERT123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tricia Murphy
21W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.75
3
JAMIE LAMBERT
11W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Rene Sheffield
17W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
2.68
Leigh Wright
16W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Cindy Gilmore
11W–16L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.67
Jenifer Spears
23W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%23%77%
2.60
Leigh Killian
9W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Debra Burroughs
8W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
Lee Embry
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
LoWanda James
3W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.37
2.5
Diana Torres
1W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Beth Thomas
26W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.