Teams

Dumas/55's A/3.5W/Fors

2025 Monroe Adult 55 & Over - Women · 3.5 Monroe (55&O) Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-16vs Cobb/55's/3.5W/MacSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTracie Ellerman / Laura Smith vs Dinah Singer / Wesley Johnson3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLynn Barron / Connie Stuckey vs Becky McCain / Cindy Strickler6-3
2025-03-02vs Cobb/55's/3.5W/MacSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCarleen Dumas / Laura Smith vs Sue Blackford / Sharon Dollins6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLynn Barron / Connie Stuckey vs Virginia Eddleman / Becky McCain4-6, 4-6
2025-02-28vs Cobb/55's/3.5W/MacLost 12
L#1 DoublesTracie Ellerman / Laura Smith vs Brenda Hilburn / Julie Johnson4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLynn Barron / Carleen Dumas vs Wesley Johnson / Marsha Cobb4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelanie Johnson / Connie Stuckey vs Debbie Barthel / Jane Jarrett0-6, 4-6
2025-02-16vs Cobb/55's/3.5W/MacLost 03
L#1 DoublesTracie Ellerman / Laura Smith vs Debbie Barthel / Jane Jarrett1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKim Schlessman / Connie Stuckey vs Virginia Eddleman / Lisa Edwards3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeth Edens / Melanie Johnson vs Sue Blackford / Sharon Dollins2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-02-08vs Cobb/55's/3.5W/MacLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Edens / Kim Schlessman vs Debbie Barthel / Jane Jarrett1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTracie Ellerman / Laura Smith vs Brenda Hilburn / Julie Johnson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarleen Dumas / Lynn Barron vs Lisa Edwards / Dianne Graham2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Monroe (55&O) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Beth Edens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Connie Stuckey
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Tracie Ellerman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Lynn Barron
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Debbie THURSTON
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Kim Schlessman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Carleen Dumas
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Edens
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Connie Stuckey
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracie Ellerman
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Lynn Barron
7W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Debbie THURSTON
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Kim Schlessman
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.98
3.5
Carleen Dumas
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.