Teams

Hills - HCC/Palmer

2022 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.57 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-11vs SVB - T. VandeBergWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeff Burdette / Brian Maltass vs Todd Vandeberg / Daniel Shields6-1, 6-1
2022-06-04vs Fishhawk - O. CantuSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJames Schneider / Brian Maltass vs Hayrettin Aslan / Luis Silva5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMax Collazo / Javid Lateef vs Omar Cantu / Mukesh Kumar7-6, 6-1
2022-05-19Won 20
W#1 SinglesBrian Maltass vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKen Chin / Javid Lateef vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Palmer / David Ponraj vs Joe Baranska / Gregory Bell6-2, 6-2
2022-04-30vs Hunters Green Kamados - M. WarrenLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Ponraj / James Schneider vs Christopher Baker / Ken Kranick4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-04-16vs Cheval 8 Horsemen - M. HayesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBrian Maltass / David Ponraj vs Matthew Hayes / Vincent Pravata4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChris Chee-A-Tow / Javid Lateef vs Jason Lichtman / Aleksandar Seovic2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
James Price
published 4
3.60
Dustin Applebaum
published 3.5
3.53
Alan Chin
published 3.5
3.49
David Ponraj
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Ken Chin
published
3.40
Chris Chee-A-Tow
published 3.5
3.40
Max Collazo
published 3.5
3.37
Javid Lateef
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.33
Michael Palmer
published
3.25
Brian Maltass
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Joseph Harrington
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Ponraj + Max Collazo7648% games−10.5% vs expected
Ken Chin + Alan Chin4265% gamesnot enough data
Ken Chin + Max Collazo404 matchesnot enough data
David Ponraj + Ken Chin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
James Price
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Dustin Applebaum
19W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%22%78%
3.60
3.5
Alan Chin
22W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
David Ponraj
172W–79L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.49
Ken Chin
21W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Chris Chee-A-Tow
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Max Collazo
66W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Javid Lateef
38W–122L career · 4 lines in 2022
85%15%<1%
3.37
Michael Palmer
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Brian Maltass
22W–44L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Joseph Harrington
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.