Teams

Paschall/FAC

2024 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.17 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-01-15vs Tevonian/Bentonville/MRCLost 03
L#1 SinglesAllyn Elleman vs Casey Tevonian5-7, 6-7
L#2 SinglesMariko Paschall vs Lauren DeLeon4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesDebby Blackburn vs Ginger Butcher1-6, 3-6
2025-01-08vs Jaggernauth/Rogers/MatrixSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAllyn Elleman vs Maria Blunden7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJenna Ruhe vs Heidi May6-2, 6-2
2025-01-03vs Scott/SVCCLost 01
L#3 SinglesMariko Paschall vs Allison Earhart5-7, 4-6
2024-12-22vs Abbott/Rogers/INDWon 21
L#1 SinglesDebby Blackburn vs Rebecca Callaway1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJenna Ruhe vs Shailyn Abbott4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 SinglesEva Berry vs Tracey Kenny3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-12-10vs Jaggernauth/Rogers/MatrixSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJenna Ruhe vs Heidi May6-1, 7-6
L#2 SinglesMargaret Schloss vs Leah Hoffmann6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-12-05vs Scott/SVCCLost 01
L#2 SinglesMariko Paschall vs Casey Tevonian1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-11-08vs Casey/BV/KTCWon 30
W#1 SinglesMariko Paschall vs Jeanie Shade6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDebby Blackburn vs Jodee Gore-Miller6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesEva Berry vs Anne Hurley6-3, 6-1
2024-10-29vs Tevonian/Bentonville/MRCLost 12
W#1 SinglesMariko Paschall vs Lauren DeLeon2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAllyn Elleman vs Nellie Jones6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesMargaret Schloss vs Ginger Butcher3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Jenna Ruhe
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.00
Allyn Elleman
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.98
Mariko Paschall
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.81
Margaret Schloss
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.66
Debby Blackburn
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.43
Eva Berry
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allyn Elleman + Mariko Paschall123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenna Ruhe
32W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Allyn Elleman
24W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
4.00
Mariko Paschall
21W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.98
Margaret Schloss
15W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Debby Blackburn
19W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Eva Berry
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.