Teams

Maggin

2024 Montgomery Adult Other Winter Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.94 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-12vs Koele/CallahanWon 10
W#2 DoublesKeelin Gallagher / Anna Maggin vs Eileen Dietz / Julie Swartz4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-08vs Block/CopelandLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnn Kopsidas / Keelin Gallagher vs Maria Marques / Monique Bonner4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-02-28vs Racket PowerLost 01
L#3 DoublesBlythe McGinty / Catherine Zimmermann vs Corlyn Krinsky / Diana Talesnick6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-02-23vs BCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesKeelin Gallagher / Catherine Zimmermann vs Bridget Foist / Jill Lavin4-6, 5-5
2024-02-16vs Smart Aces 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesKeelin Gallagher / Catherine Zimmermann vs Maria Elena Greene / Alexandra Hall Hall7-5, 5-5
2024-01-08vs Love All 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCatherine Zimmermann / Nita Kramer vs Mari Collins / Miyuki Sato2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Dawn Yules
published 4
3.87
Cheryl Hays
published 4
Allison Fulton
published 4
Anna Maggin
published 4
Christine Koy
published 4
3.74
Ann Kopsidas
published 4
3.73
Meredith Berlin
published
3.73
Keelin Gallagher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Laurie Stien
published
3.60
Kim Purring
published
3.38
Catherine Zimmermann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Elana Steinberg
published
Lisa Rudden
published
Nancy Eisner
published
Rebecca Sirody
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keelin Gallagher + Catherine Zimmermann6355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dawn Yules
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Cheryl Hays
6W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Allison Fulton
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Anna Maggin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Christine Koy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Ann Kopsidas
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
Meredith Berlin
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Keelin Gallagher
77W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Laurie Stien
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Kim Purring
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.60
3.5
Catherine Zimmermann
17W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.38
Elana Steinberg
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Rudden
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Eisner
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Sirody
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.