Teams

2-Post-Rust-DFC

2023 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women-Day

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-01vs 3-ALeinbach-CHTCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSusana Harvey / Mary Parker vs Vicky Arne / Valerie Conklin5-7, 3-6
2023-04-24vs 4-PMathena-HRLost 02
L#1 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Katie Neal2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusana Harvey / Mary Parker vs Karin Yoch / Debbie Fuller3-6, 5-7
2023-04-19vs 3-ALeinbach-CHTCLost 02
L#1 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Amy Beth Kessinger1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Hurley / Mary Parker vs Adrianne Leinbach / Sarah Grant3-6, 2-6
2023-04-17vs 5-RHowarth-UNCWon 21
W#1 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Sophie Brock6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMary Parker / Susana Harvey vs Cristina Smith / Kate Elia4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Alden / Patricia Hurley vs Judy Thomson / Elaine Yeh7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-13vs 4-PMathena-HRSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Katie Neal2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSusana Harvey / Nancy Draughon vs Mary Fortin / Nancy Riefkohl6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2023-04-10vs 1-ANarbut-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Andrea Narbut3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPatricia Hurley / Jeanne Murray vs Deborah Howard / Barbara Estay2-6, 5-7
2023-03-22vs 5-RHowarth-UNCLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusie Post-Rust / Barbara Gillespie vs Cristina Smith / Kate Elia1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-03-06vs 1-ANarbut-EnoLost 01
L#1 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Jenni Soccorso5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women-Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Susana Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.61
Susie Post-Rust
usually #1 Singles 91%, also #1 Doubles 9% · published 4
3.48
Nancy Draughon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Susan Alden
published
2.97
Jeanne Murray
published
Kelli Dugan
published
Patricia Hurley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Draughon + Susana Harvey551264% games+2.5% vs expected
Susie Post-Rust + Susana Harvey1445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Susana Harvey
402W–157L career · type A · 10 lines in 2023
<1%2%98%
3.77
4
Susie Post-Rust
81W–94L career · 11 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.61
3.5
Nancy Draughon
210W–73L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
Susan Alden
15W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.22
Jeanne Murray
13W–31L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
Kelli Dugan
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
0
Patricia Hurley
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.