← Teams

SHC-Butrick

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.27 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Alan Kaplan
published 4
3.67
John Major
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.09
Bert Berends
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Dan Wendling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.89
Mike Baker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Michael Siebers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Jim George
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Les Wellman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Doug Cumming
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Scott Havens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Larry Butrick
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-05-16Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMike Baker / Bert Berends vs Tony Humpage / Jeffrey Bayless6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLarry Butrick / Jim George vs Dave Hall / JOHN KNOX6-1, 6-4
2024-05-09Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMike Baker / Bert Berends vs Steve Russell / Mister Archedon6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKeith Jones / Scott Havens vs Mitchell Whitehurst / Robert Piercy6-1, 6-1
2024-04-25Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMike Baker / Bert Berends vs James Horen / William Pettis6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMichael Siebers / Terry Casebeer vs Alan Potts / Andrew Kitchen6-1, 6-4
2024-04-18Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLes Wellman / Doug Cumming vs Steven Boeh / Roger North6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Major / Larry Butrick vs Terence Gariety / Jim Gerber6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichael Siebers / Terry Casebeer vs Randy Boose / Vilath Oudomphong6-2, 6-0
2024-04-11Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesDan Wendling / Mike Baker vs Craig Frasier / Robin Olson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Major / Scott Havens vs Jeff Wheeler / John Hummel7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLes Wellman / Terry Casebeer vs Donny Cablao / Jeff Gonzales6-3, 6-3
2024-04-05Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJohn Major / Doug Cumming vs Rolf Ellingsen / Rick Raivio6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDan Wendling / Terry Casebeer vs Hayward Reed / John Wallin6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLes Wellman / Jim George vs Bill Swift / Richard Tippets6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-28Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAlan Kaplan / Doug Cumming vs Tommy Atkins / Jeff Cruze6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDan Wendling / Jim George vs Tom Tsuruta / Dale Vandenburgh6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Major / Larry Butrick vs Robert Cohns / Michael Kohlhoff6-3, 6-0
2024-03-21Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDan Wendling / Terry Casebeer vs Alan Jones / Mister Archedon6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlan Kaplan / Doug Cumming vs Lee Wiegand / Clay Funkhouser6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLes Wellman / Scott Havens vs Jon Mandeville / Charles Stewart7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Alan Kaplan
11W–13L career
not enough data
—
4
John Major
9W–20L career
15%83%2%
3.67
3.5
Bert Berends
14W–37L career
23%76%0%
3.09
3.5
Dan Wendling
52W–43L career
39%61%0%
2.99
3
Mike Baker
47W–91L career
0%96%4%
2.89
3
Michael Siebers
20W–40L career · type S
6%91%4%
2.76
3
Jim George
30W–21L career
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Les Wellman
43W–42L career
not enough data
—
3
Doug Cumming
27W–25L career
1%99%0%
2.73
3
Scott Havens
4W–10L career
6%92%2%
2.73
3
Larry Butrick
47W–55L career
37%63%0%
2.50

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.