Teams

Wolfanger/Memphis

2025 Combo 40 & Over - Memphis · 6.5 40 & Over Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-16vs Nair/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmasa Lacy / Elizabeth Johnson vs Jennifer Larkin / Ann Yackel4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKrista Weber / Mary Durham vs Amy Worrell Sterling / Monica Gallimore6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesConstance Conley / Melanie Sparks vs Letitia Phillips / Maricela Robles-Murguia6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-10vs Picha/MemphisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMandy Rude / Melanie Sparks vs Kathy Crowder / Tina Schneiderman6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKrista Weber / Kecia Coleman vs Terrie Dietsch / Debbie Pacheco6-1, 6-1
2025-09-08vs Picha/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesMandy Rude / Tammy Smalley vs Jo Picha / Leslie Darling6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnne Higgins / Krista Weber vs Courtney Perrin / Melissa Hurt6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichele Smith / Constance Conley vs Ellen Skinner / Christine Mendoza5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-06vs Nair/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Goodwin / Amasa Lacy vs Ann Yackel / Lisa Evans6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKecia Coleman / Mary Durham vs Heather Purzner / Jennifer Larkin6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesConstance Conley / Elizabeth Johnson vs Deepa Nair / Ping Zhou4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-16vs Picha/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelanie Sparks / Mandy Rude vs Cristi Ross / Tarshian Moon6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonna Wolfanger / Krista Weber vs Dana Stout / Melissa Hurt5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKecia Coleman / Mary Durham vs Christine Mendoza / Courtney Perrin6-2, 6-1
2025-08-13vs Nair/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Higgins / Tammy Smalley vs Lisa Monahan / Ann Yackel6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichele Smith / Constance Conley vs Letitia Phillips / Susan Patrone6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Wolfanger / Amasa Lacy vs Maricela Robles-Murguia / Deepa Nair6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Anne Higgins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Nancy Goodwin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Donna Wolfanger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Mandy Rude
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Kecia Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Krista Weber
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.94
Tammy Smalley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Amasa Lacy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Constance Conley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Melanie Sparks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Higgins + Nancy Goodwin14268% games+17.3% vs expected
Nancy Goodwin + Kecia Coleman18364% games+10.6% vs expected
Anne Higgins + Mandy Rude314 matchesnot enough data
Donna Wolfanger + Anne Higgins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne Higgins
45W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Nancy Goodwin
78W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.68
Donna Wolfanger
26W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Mandy Rude
22W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Kecia Coleman
51W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.11
Krista Weber
28W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Tammy Smalley
41W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Amasa Lacy
29W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Constance Conley
18W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Melanie Sparks
11W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.