Teams

S.Luther

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-10vs L.Hatlen 40Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMolly Briggs / Fran Ange vs Zana Piric / Susan Paeplow4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDana Chapman / Heidi Bloom vs Lori Hatlen / Jeanmarie Warren3-6, 5-7
2023-05-04vs M.HowardLost 02
L#1 DoublesJuli Korsnack / Annette Page vs Meghan Howard / Lisa Buyaki1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFran Ange / Korri Styers vs Liz Broadway / Sandra Chapman-Wilson4-6, 4-6
2023-04-20vs J.BRITTLost 12
W#1 SinglesJuli Korsnack vs Emily Culbreth6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Luther / Karen Ice vs Sandra Rhoades / Miranda Harmon2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDana Chapman / Dolores Quesenberry vs Marti Crane / Cindy Rosplock2-6, 1-6
2023-04-13vs K.PatreySplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnnette Page / Karen Ice vs Lisa Kempf / Marina Barthalmus6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesFran Ange / Molly Briggs vs Allison Graves / Jane Williams2-6, 5-7
2023-03-23vs M.HowardSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMolly Briggs / Fran Ange vs Gwynn Thayer / Anneliese Carr6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristi Bowser / Karen Ice vs Suzanne Trexler / Emily Cutts6-7, 2-6
2023-03-16vs L.Hatlen 40Lost 13
L#1 DoublesAnnette Page / Dolores Quesenberry vs Zana Piric / Susan Paeplow6-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJuli Korsnack vs Courtney Whalen6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFran Ange / Heidi Bloom vs Emily Johnson / Lori Hatlen6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Ice / Julia Killian vs Janelle Howard / Janet Sprague1-6, 4-6
2023-03-14vs K.PatreyLost 02
L#1 DoublesDolores Quesenberry / Juli Korsnack vs Allison Graves / Leah Weinberger6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDana Chapman / Mindy Ladd vs Jane Williams / Lydia Pasteris5-7, 3-6
2023-03-09vs J.BRITTLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnnette Page / Fran Ange vs Mary Money / Kristal Nelson0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJuli Korsnack vs Miranda Harmon6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMolly Briggs / Karen Ice vs Sandra Rhoades / Marti Crane6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Molly Briggs
published
3.83
Juli Korsnack
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
Dolores Quesenberry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Annette Page
published 4
3.60
Karen Ice
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.53
Pam Rigsby
published
3.32
Sherrie Lefere
published
3.31
Dana Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Julia Killian
published
3.29
Fran Ange
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Korri Styers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dolores Quesenberry + Juli Korsnack2349% gamesnot enough data
Fran Ange + Dolores Quesenberry224 matchesnot enough data
Fran Ange + Juli Korsnack044 matchesnot enough data
Annette Page + Molly Briggs404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Briggs
34W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Juli Korsnack
99W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Dolores Quesenberry
66W–83L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Annette Page
19W–14L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Karen Ice
101W–74L career · 5 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
Pam Rigsby
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Sherrie Lefere
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.32
3.5
Dana Chapman
57W–66L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Julia Killian
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Fran Ange
74W–101L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
Korri Styers
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.