Teams

Mid-Court Crisis

2021 Howard-Columbia Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over Men 4.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.80 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-08-06vs MVLee 4.0 (40+)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJeffery Bishoff / Daniel Berland vs Alexandre Fines / Andy Lee4-5
2021-08-01Won 10
W#3 DoublesJeffery Bishoff / Andrew Chen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-23vs Cobra Kai (40+)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJeff Brainard / Andy Sasaki vs David Trang / Michael Jarman2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRenaldo Savady vs Mikhail Laryukhin3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJeffery Bishoff / Daniel Berland vs Matt Weirich / Luis Lozano1-6, 0-6
2021-07-19vs Over The Wall 4.0 (40+)Won 20
W#1 SinglesRenaldo Savady vs Sridhar Atluri6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeffery Bishoff / Jonathan Wiggins vs Robert Fox / Doug Gruys6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2021-07-06vs MVLee 4.0 (40+)Split 11
L#1 SinglesAndy Sasaki vs Rob Dragonette1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJeffery Bishoff / Steven Arnheim vs Peter Kim / Brian Porteus7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2021-07-01vs Cobra Kai (40+)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesChuong Dang / Renaldo Savady vs David Trang / Jonathan Rivera6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJeff Brainard / Andy Sasaki vs Christopher Lee / Geoffrey Montgomery3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeffery Bishoff / Andrew Currie vs DONALD CRAWLEY / KHOURY ZIAD2-6, 2-6
2021-06-23vs MVLee 4.0 (40+)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Brainard / Andy Sasaki vs Brian Porteus / Michael Vanderputten3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRenaldo Savady vs Jeffrey Katz2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-06-21vs Over The Wall 4.0 (40+)Won 30
W#1 DoublesChuong Dang / Renaldo Savady vs Daniel Mandl / Al Zanger6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeff Brainard / Andy Sasaki vs Ethan Stryker / Patrick Doane6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJeffery Bishoff / Andrew Currie vs Larry Wall / Sung Kim7-5, 6-3
2021-06-08vs Cobra Kai (40+)Won 10
W#3 DoublesTom Somers / Renaldo Savady vs David Trang / Dat Doan4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-05Won 10
W#3 DoublesJeffery Bishoff / James Pope vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Renaldo Savady
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Chuong Dang
published 4
3.75
James Pope
published 4
3.42
Andy Sasaki
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.10
Jeffery Bishoff
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
Jonathan Wiggins
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Renaldo Savady
224W–182L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Chuong Dang
27W–23L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
James Pope
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Andy Sasaki
66W–84L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Jeffery Bishoff
50W–95L career · 8 lines in 2021
21%78%<1%
3.10
Jonathan Wiggins
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.