← Teams

N OR-WHRC-Webb

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.21 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Heather MacPherson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.43
Emily Qi
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.29
Gail Bolte
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.20
Inge Marshall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Suzanne Friedman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Margaret Convery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.21
Pamela Grant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
—
Amy Crews
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 0
Results9 ties
2023-06-24Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesAmy Crews / Jennifer Thompson vs Amy Higgins / Wendy Redding6-2, 6-3
2022-11-20Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesSandie Yamauchi / Emily Qi vs Shuping Li / Lisa Hockman6-4, 6-5
W#2 DoublesHeather MacPherson / Suzanne Friedman vs Ellen Bradley / Judy Chaput6-1, 6-2
2022-11-19Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesCaryn Cohen / Inge Marshall vs Dorothy Rodegerdts / Julie Mathews6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Thompson / Amy Crews vs Jean Stevens / Christina Gibson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-11-13Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesSandie Yamauchi / Gail Bolte vs Deborah Cohen / Anita Palodichuk6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPamela Grant / KIT THAKKAR vs Angela Jackson / Kristin DeVoto6-2, 6-1
2022-11-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesGail Bolte / Heather MacPherson vs Barbara Mesher / Sarah Fredericks6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Qi / Inge Marshall vs Melanie Morris / Barbara Friesen6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJennifer Thompson / Amy Crews vs Ellen Wood / Jean Jensen7-5, 7-5
2022-10-09Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesMargaret Convery / Inge Marshall vs Gina Mandel / Karen Simon6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKIT THAKKAR / Pamela Grant vs Allison Bader / Bess Jacobo6-2, 6-4
2022-10-07Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMargaret Convery / Caryn Cohen vs Tina Kriebaum / Minhhang Tran6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Qi / Sandie Yamauchi vs Carol Kviz / Tina Nelson6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Friedman / Inge Marshall vs Vanessa Gallant / Denise Westby6-1, 6-0
2022-09-11Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesMargaret Convery / Caryn Cohen vs Jean Jensen / Amy Korkowski6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAmy Crews / KIT THAKKAR vs Laura Walker / Ellen Wood6-4, 7-6
2022-09-10Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMargaret Convery / Heather MacPherson vs Christina Gibson / Sanae Ito6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesEmily Qi / Sandie Yamauchi vs Theresa Luthi / Dorothy Rodegerdts6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJennifer Thompson / Amy Crews vs Marianne Conroy / Fran Hepp6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Heather MacPherson
64W–35L career
0%71%29%
3.54
3.5
Emily Qi
87W–54L career
0%92%8%
3.43
3.5
Gail Bolte
93W–77L career
0%99%1%
3.29
3.5
Inge Marshall
58W–32L career
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Suzanne Friedman
25W–28L career
0%88%12%
2.92
3
Margaret Convery
41W–41L career
0%98%2%
2.84
2.5
Pamela Grant
35W–45L career
0%95%5%
2.21
0
Amy Crews
6W–9L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.