Teams

MOValley/Jackson/65&Over9.0M

2022 Adult 65 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 9.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 9.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MOValley/Jackson/65&Over9.0M000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Dave Hoover
published 3.5
3.57
Ronald Dreher
published
Bruce van Maanen
published
Daniel Sloboth
published
Rodney Lawrence
published
Terry Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dave Hoover
43W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%7%93%
3.70
Ronald Dreher
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
Bruce van Maanen
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Daniel Sloboth
18W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rodney Lawrence
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Terry Jackson
31W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.