Teams

Best/Conley

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 55 & over · Women 7.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-24vs MacCall/Murphy DayLost 12
W#1 DoublesJan Best / Mimi Cartee vs Marlene Fricano / Tara MacCall6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDonna Beaman / Anne Murray vs Waleska Altreuter / Suzy Horvath2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKelly Bradshaw / Donna Petrilla vs Mia Delmontagne / Caroline McMahon6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-08-19vs Williamson/WilsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesAdair Wright / Jan Best vs Lori Keipper / Rachael Bondy3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKellie Keehn / Barbara Conley vs Beth OConnor / Sabrina Nikel7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWendy McElhinney / Donna Petrilla vs Kelli Brownfield / Catherine Richard3-6, 3-6
2026-08-15vs Adams 7.5 55Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Thompson / Lisa Arakelian vs Kim Morris / Pamela Furr2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAdair Wright / Kelly Bradshaw vs Shameena Broach / Allison Horton5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDonna Beaman / Beth Skidmore vs Jennifer Adams / Dorothy Crumpton2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adair Wright
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Mimi Cartee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Kelly Bradshaw
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Wendy McElhinney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Beth Skidmore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Barbara Conley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Donna Beaman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Jan Best
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Donna Petrilla
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kellie Keehn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Arakelian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Beaman + Beth Skidmore4146% gamesnot enough data
Jan Best + Donna Beaman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adair Wright
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mimi Cartee
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Kelly Bradshaw
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.44
Wendy McElhinney
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Beth Skidmore
15W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Barbara Conley
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Donna Beaman
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Jan Best
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
Donna Petrilla
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
Kellie Keehn
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Arakelian
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.