Teams

Nicholson 9.0

2021 Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 9.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.44 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-22Won 20
W#1 DoublesDean Packard / Kareen Whiteley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Nuscher / Tatiana Loboda vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-08-08vs King PenguinsWon 20
W#2 DoublesTatiana Loboda / Max Misner vs Heather Herman / Jacob Herman6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRoselle Nicholson / James Hosie vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-18vs King PenguinsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKareen Whiteley / Dean Packard vs DONALD CRAWLEY / Elizabeth Larson3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRoselle Nicholson / James Hosie vs Henry Cha / Jean Lim3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-11vs King PenguinsWon 10
W#3 DoublesRobert Nuscher / Tatiana Loboda vs Buthaina Shukri / Tom Lusby7-5, 6-0
2021-06-27vs King PenguinsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJared Fly / Marketa Chromkova vs Meghan Damico / Samuel Borchers6-2, 6-4
2021-06-13vs King PenguinsWon 10
W#2 DoublesEllen Berlinghof / Jared Fly vs Henry Cha / Gabrielle Cha6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
James Hosie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.40
Matthew Geppi
published 4.5
4.35
Robert Nuscher
published
Gregory Chambers
published 4.5
4.21
Hillary Kuker
published 4.5
4.19
Rikke Kemp
published
4.16
Jared Fly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.15
Sam Lieber
published
4.08
Lindsey Keeler
published
4.05
Tatiana Loboda
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.76
Roselle Nicholson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.52
Al Baker
published 4
Kareen Whiteley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roselle Nicholson + James Hosie404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
James Hosie
53W–41L career · type A · 2 lines in 2021
<1%55%44%
4.48
4.5
Matthew Geppi
225W–81L career · no lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
4.40
Robert Nuscher
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
4.35
4.5
Gregory Chambers
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Hillary Kuker
7W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
4.21
Rikke Kemp
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
8%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Jared Fly
206W–121L career · 2 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
4.16
Sam Lieber
6W–3L career · no lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
4.15
Lindsey Keeler
25W–18L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Tatiana Loboda
178W–130L career · 6 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
4.05
4.5
Roselle Nicholson
97W–72L career · 7 lines in 2021
97%3%<1%
3.76
4
Al Baker
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.52
Kareen Whiteley
38W–46L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.