Teams

WI Adult 18&O 4.0W GML Brookfield East Kalbach

2025 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women (Eve)

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 DoublesAnne Daniels / LIsa Turkow vs Georgia Rockwell / Michelle Zwicky6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHeidi Stigler vs Annie Voltner6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Kalbach / Andrea Jumes vs Kristen Lambrecht / Bethany Girardi6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesAnjali Sharma vs Sarah Schuler2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDeanna Weiss / Sarah Garstecki vs Michelle Knudten / Sonja Devcic4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesLIsa Turkow / Andrea Jumes vs Beth Ramsey / Tracy Stolte3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKristyn Klind vs Brenda Blunt6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Daniels / Andrea Rowe vs Amy Meyer / Mary Murphy1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAnjali Sharma vs Holly Haas1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Garstecki / Susan Kalbach vs Wendy Vernon / Christi Witt0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesLIsa Turkow / Heidi Stigler vs Merla Borth / Kellie Anderson4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Kalbach / Andrea Jumes vs Heather Szerbat / Leah Damron6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAnjali Sharma vs Amber Wichowsky2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKristyn Klind / Andrea Rowe vs Sarah Langerman / Peggy Yang6-7, 3-6
W#1 DoublesHeidi Stigler / Andrea Jumes vs Lisa Pederson / Annette Malloy5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Daniels / Andrea Rowe vs Pamela Flores / Rae Krivohlavek2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNicole Penegor vs Judy Carlson4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDeanna Weiss / Sarah Garstecki vs Pamela Evans / Laura Petrie Anderson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesHeidi Stigler / Jena Smith vs Karine Gonzales / Natasha Duvall2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnjali Sharma vs Grace Dsouza3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristyn Klind / Andrea Rowe vs Ruth McGuire / Keri Sarajian5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Garstecki vs Ingrid H Davis0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Kalbach / Deanna Weiss vs Mallory Warner / Maureen Stalle4-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesAnne Daniels / LIsa Turkow vs Michelle Zwicky / Sarah Schuler3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKristyn Klind vs Annie Voltner7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Kalbach / Nicole Penegor vs Kristen Lambrecht / Brigitte Potter6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSarah Garstecki vs KT Schroeder1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDeanna Weiss / Anjali Sharma vs Melissa Premeau / Silvia Zapien2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesLIsa Turkow / Heidi Stigler vs Beth Ramsey / Sara Kartz2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnjali Sharma vs Holly Haas2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndrea Rowe / Kristyn Klind vs Christi Witt / Amy Meyer5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesWei Speagle vs Kristin Lehman4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnne Daniels / Deanna Weiss vs Mary Murphy / Wendy Vernon6-3, 7-5
L#1 DoublesAndrea Rowe / LIsa Turkow vs Carol Kossoris / Laura Otto3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Jumes / Susan Kalbach vs Anfin Jaw Wise / Laura Petrie Anderson6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesWei Speagle vs Hannah P Huth0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesHeidi Stigler / Sarah Garstecki vs Jean Stevens / Pamela Evans6-1, 6-4
W#1 DoublesJena Smith / Heidi Stigler vs Diane Harmening / Merla Borth6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWei Speagle vs Elsa Heinrich6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndrea Rowe / Susan Kalbach vs Lisa Ellegard / Joyce Koker3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAnjali Sharma vs Amber Wichowsky3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeanna Weiss / Nicole Penegor vs Sarah Langerman / Peggy Yang6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesLIsa Turkow / Susan Kalbach vs Dana Minning / Bryn Gonzales2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnne Daniels / Andrea Rowe vs Natasha Duvall / Leslie Brooks6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesNicole Penegor / Sarah Garstecki vs Mallory Warner / Maureen Stalle4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · WI Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women (Eve)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Adult 18&O 4.0W GML Princeton Club Witt82351539365
2WI Adult 18&O 4.0W GML Lake Geneve Tennis Roach71291125234
3WI Adult 18&O 4.0W GML River Glen Elite Ellegard73302052435
4WI Adult 18&O 4.0W GML Lake Country WAC Toboyek62291126261
5WI Adult 18&O 4.0W GML Heyer Park Kossoris55262453414
6WI Adult 18&O 4.0W GML Town Club Duvall55242655456
7WI Adult 18&O 4.0W GML Brookfield East Kalbach55232766481
8WI Adult 18&O 4.0W GML Western Racquet Jensen44172350380
9WI Adult 18&O 4.0W GML Arrowhead HS Pasternak26142658417
10WI Adult 18&O 4.0W GML Lake Country WAC Abhold17112963416
11WI Adult 18&O 4.0W GML Elm Grove Park Knudten010123882548

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Andrea Jumes
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.80
Anne Daniels
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4
3.77
Heidi Stigler
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
3.76
Kristyn Klind
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.70
Andrea Rowe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.62
LIsa Turkow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Anjali Sharma
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.61
Deanna Weiss
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.60
Wei Speagle
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.57
Nicole Penegor
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.47
Susan Kalbach
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jena Smith
published
Sarah Garstecki
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Kalbach + Andrea Jumes6076% games+17.8% vs expected
Andrea Rowe + Anne Daniels17754% games+6.2% vs expected
Susan Kalbach + Nicole Penegor24762% games+4.4% vs expected
Andrea Rowe + Kristyn Klind10754% games+4.4% vs expected
Andrea Rowe + Nicole Penegor7556% games+2.5% vs expected
LIsa Turkow + Deanna Weiss5453% games+1.7% vs expected
Susan Kalbach + Andrea Rowe3948% games+1.7% vs expected
Andrea Rowe + Deanna Weiss3253% games−0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrea Jumes
20W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.09
4
Anne Daniels
54W–25L career · 11 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Heidi Stigler
9W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Kristyn Klind
26W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Andrea Rowe
54W–59L career · 14 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
LIsa Turkow
82W–47L career · 7 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Anjali Sharma
30W–23L career · 15 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.61
4
Deanna Weiss
63W–52L career · 10 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.61
4
Wei Speagle
76W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
3.5
Nicole Penegor
73W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Susan Kalbach
95W–61L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
Jena Smith
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Garstecki
12W–4L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.