Teams

IE-CL-Linda Hockenbery

2022 USTA Adult 55 & Over - IE · IE Women 6.0

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-04vs SoCal/Rydall/55&Over6.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Hockenbery / Sandee Clow vs Elizabeth Rydall / Jo Russo-Pereyra1-6, 1-6
2022-05-29vs IE-Four Seasons-Bernadette MartinLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Hockenbery / Satoko Parsons vs Bernadette Chance / Lou Stokes4-6, 3-6
2022-05-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesLinda Hockenbery / Debra Sacks vs Bernadette Martin / Sheryl Beckman6-2, 6-0
2022-05-01vs SoCal/Rydall/55&Over6.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Hockenbery / Lorette Oliver vs Denise Stewart / Susane Hong2-6, 0-6
2022-04-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Hockenbery / Lorette Oliver vs Rebecca Flowers / Josie Beauchamp3-6, 0-6
2022-04-10vs SoCal/Rydall/55&Over6.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Hockenbery / Debra Sacks vs Susane Hong / Denise Stewart1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Carrie Collins
published 3
2.88
Satoko Parsons
published
2.53
Sandee Clow
published
2.36
Linda Hockenbery
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carrie Collins
18W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
Satoko Parsons
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Sandee Clow
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Linda Hockenbery
34W–106L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.